Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5026812ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:58:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTEpMTB1GJfxMPV8qD7Yhc5WoC+9Se0eW3P/yGebz/hALJqrYhQbDvLQqYEYncB+s4JfIz X-Received: by 2002:aca:48d6:: with SMTP id v205mr7199165oia.10.1579712282424; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:58:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579712282; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YroRJlVmbQ8+rxpQyTLxdYC84HOUZovF0eFxkOEyMlN4pUDGk91DGmutuTxaDVQJxR NlMEksLTojftKKD0ecG+6RpnU/eXIjs3Zgo0Z5qLttZ4DaZLUaa+PY1YIbYWLrHLnhcT nc5DtRHsMfy8MzCpimBpbc+X3Wkl7fwg+poJ1iXEwExZ647QAGUO/PeOX1ExjhFCtjH+ dCRu3gZupOstnpsoACi2BThAZz710DNMlNml/Q9J8wSgYhwaGqHy/WcXKt/Bedb1MBHC FQJfX0dyTnFljVXqtj8e21126YdxL+DVgjor38PqjGqKTYMgmcOACZP3gZBTWcYr2FpS pAZQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-disposition:in-reply-to :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=NASuyEyKYkLSIlHTQ24JmoHojA+s1CTO2zBxCaYhsHE=; b=ynVn8wQzeiNh3UPY7hhL1xBhblqByCmiUHQ3gsMnYTy4WBW/COXIygzseF9w+fvMNz +8kRNRBwIHL2EVMk0Tx8P+YjtGRYMQegMqF+z8RvwWsvkLvO2odo4rM/sSyeTgEHauZG yU5ZdSm7O/tHestmCKiart5lYd+OA8vxSALlfZxaB2BP9YHNQija5T7dkrfSG9V0fnIR iySjfMrnXcalv7nZMnfGqPusk2KMuABOb6fyTiNxwKhBzIn2dwf0Sd3Acp1GXSeE9XMP EF+VRjZ1EXLeEgfPwArk4vYgbW/Ra7/40eegY+pEYmJRP+5XGSDjDwzr3uUr4QvEk/B3 MFaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=jR3nz3O4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y140si21685322oia.49.2020.01.22.08.57.49; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:58:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=jR3nz3O4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728767AbgAVQ4s (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:56:48 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:48645 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726005AbgAVQ4r (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:56:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579712205; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NASuyEyKYkLSIlHTQ24JmoHojA+s1CTO2zBxCaYhsHE=; b=jR3nz3O4a7ojv3LuoWrY47VlQgDcTIaOYpCiAQJUED5ZhBBqCwJ6C+l7SRQGsOYRKbCp4c 0RshWqG3rBJ/mHjJUoWZHmi3/NHLnCSXKoOQ1nXxZpoaRfXErNtNJQuitC8yT9idIW9WBt lsbeiqu/bTEJjdEIThPd4jlAhO94cgY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-175-kTw0fLkqPS2hEdxFlzDRmA-1; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:56:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: kTw0fLkqPS2hEdxFlzDRmA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA13800D4E; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.36.118.106]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA3A5E248; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:56:37 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: "Liu, Jing2" Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, slp@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Peng , Zha Bin , Liu Jiang Subject: Re: [virtio-dev][PATCH v1 1/2] virtio-mmio: Add MSI and different notification address support Message-ID: <20200122165637.GD677983@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <1576855504-34947-1-git-send-email-jing2.liu@linux.intel.com> <20200106161836.GB350142@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20200110095217.GB573283@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <801cf09a-759f-b6bf-e71b-02dbf0f1d513@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <801cf09a-759f-b6bf-e71b-02dbf0f1d513@linux.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:54:06PM +0800, Liu, Jing2 wrote: > > > > > \end{note} > > > > > } > > > > > \hline > > > > > @@ -1671,25 +1671,23 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\= label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi > > > > > accesses apply to the queue selected by writing to \field{= QueueSel}. > > > > > } > > > > > \hline > > > > > - \mmioreg{QueueNotify}{Queue notifier}{0x050}{W}{% > > > > > - Writing a value to this register notifies the device that > > > > > - there are new buffers to process in a queue. > > > > > + \mmioreg{QueueNotify}{Queue notifier}{0x050}{RW}{% > > > > > + Reading from the register returns the virtqueue notification= configuration. > > > > > - When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, > > > > > - the value written is the queue index. > > > > > + See \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO / M= MIO-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Notification Address} > > > > > + for the configuration format. > > > > > - When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, > > > > > - the \field{Notification data} value has the following format= : > > > > > + Writing when the notification address calculated by the noti= fication configuration > > > > > + is just located at this register. > > > > I don't understand this sentence. What happens when the driver wri= tes > > > > to this register? > > > We're trying to define the notification mechanism that, driver MUST r= ead > > > 0x50 to get the notification configuration > > >=20 > > > and calculate the notify address. The writing case here is that, the = notify > > > address is just located here e.g. notify_base=3D0x50, notify_mul=3D0. > > I still don't understand what this means. It's just an English issue > > and it will become clear if you can rephrase what you're saying. >=20 > Sure, let me try to explain it. :) >=20 > The different notification locations are calculated via the structure > returned by reading this register. >=20 > le32 { > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 notify_base : 16; > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 notify_multiplier : 16; > }; >=20 > location=3Dnotify_base + queue_index * notify_multiplier >=20 > The location might be the same when mul=3D0, and furthermore, it might be > equal to 0x50 (notify_base=3D0x50, notify_mul=3D0) so we make this regist= er W > too. >=20 > So we said, the register is RW and W is only for such scenario. >=20 > Feel free to tell me if it's still confusing. I understand now: Devices that only require a single notify address may set notify_base=3D0x50 and notify_multiplier=3D0 to use the Queue Notifier register itself for notifications. In this case the driver writes to Queue Notifier to notify the device that there are new buffers in a virtqueue. Perhaps you could include this in the text. > > > > > - \lstinputlisting{notifications-le.c} > > > > > - > > > > > - See \ref{sec:Virtqueues / Driver notifications}~\nameref{sec= :Virtqueues / Driver notifications} > > > > > - for the definition of the components. > > > > > + See \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO / M= MIO-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notific= ations} > > > > > + to see the notification data format. > > > > > } > > > > > \hline > > > > > \mmioreg{InterruptStatus}{Interrupt status}{0x60}{R}{% > > > > > Reading from this register returns a bit mask of events th= at > > > > > - caused the device interrupt to be asserted. > > > > > + caused the device interrupt to be asserted. This is only use= d > > > > > + when MSI is not enabled. > > > > > The following events are possible: > > > > > \begin{description} > > > > > \item[Used Buffer Notification] - bit 0 - the interrupt = was asserted > > > > > @@ -1703,7 +1701,7 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\la= bel{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi > > > > > \mmioreg{InterruptACK}{Interrupt acknowledge}{0x064}{W}{% > > > > > Writing a value with bits set as defined in \field{Interru= ptStatus} > > > > > to this register notifies the device that events causing > > > > > - the interrupt have been handled. > > > > > + the interrupt have been handled. This is only used when MSI = is not enabled. > > > > > } > > > > > \hline > > > > > \mmioreg{Status}{Device status}{0x070}{RW}{% > > > > > @@ -1762,6 +1760,31 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\l= abel{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi > > > > > \field{SHMSel} is unused) results in a base address of > > > > > 0xffffffffffffffff. > > > > > } > > > > > + \hline > > > > > + \mmioreg{MsiStatus}{MSI status}{0x0c0}{R}{% > > > > > + Reading from this register returns the global MSI enable/dis= able status and maximum > > > > > + number of virtqueues that device supports. > > > > > + \lstinputlisting{msi-status.c} > > > > > + } > > > > Why is it necessary to combine the number of virtqueues and global > > > > MSI enable/disable into a single 16-bit field? > > > Originally, we want this 16-bit Read-Only, so we put some RO things t= ogether > > > and separate > > >=20 > > > enable setting command to next register. > > >=20 > > > > virtio-mmio uses 32-bit registers. It doesn't try hard to save reg= ister > > > > space so it's strange to do it here (11-bit number of virtqueue fie= ld > > > > but 32-bit QueueSel field). > > > In order to improve performance/save register space,=C2=A0 we combine= some data > > > together. > > >=20 > > > For example, combine MSI cmd operator (e.g. enable/disable, vector se= tup) > > > with argument (e.g. 1/0,=C2=A0 queue index). > > >=20 > > > But it seems we miss the consistency with QueueSel.=C2=A0 So do you t= hink if the > > > max queue number should be 32-bit, > > >=20 > > > which means it must be the same with QueueSel? If so, I guess we need= some > > > re-organization. :) > > I suggest following the 32-bit register size convention unless there is > > a specific reason why using other register sizes is absolutely necessar= y. >=20 > Yes, let's keep consistency with QueueSel and re-organize other registers= . >=20 > I feel concern why Available Bu=EF=AC=80er Notifcations (section describi= ng > VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) makes vq index as 16bit? As you mentioned, the valid range of virtqueue numbers is only 16 bits due to non-MMIO parts of the specification using 16 bits. However, I think it makes sense to stick to the MMIO transport 32-bit register size convention for consistency. Devices just won't support values above 0xffff. Stefan --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAl4ofsUACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8jpJQgAkwY6jBtWqkvTC96YuKEAkir+ohEBSvoQ/i4KaAe6BdMqk8pIHdbtZh5u 3tZ8wbtOD9/g7jNBICwGGG75k8LozgRCHsvmyOS+e2jkQXF0z7nQqabCv7iXL7OJ 3w1c8+GMBI5JExEUhgG9fKYdYZjeScOPqZEkPsz/Kh1MkEHKSXjT+IW/M0mn/nfi 8+Nn+i1omJJSpaUhs5a3PIThsuiy9d8WoUGC7H2kY6rSStABaKmIAsXeGQOl4KHu V8qgb9AlwcMSn+s4g//7HpoIG4UynJG7oPGbFVdhq3UB+F7xDMCLaUci/vz0nvt/ 8SKdn0farlHbqXvutpDjHEfQEdvX9g== =vT+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB--