Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5064304ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:37:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBEOScRiXrMNkzvHy3DulMsKrtqvzGhV4yRE9xNixsy+HDgATmoJSCiDH0DQEq3G8kNVIQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:244:: with SMTP id m4mr7724705oie.125.1579714639004; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:37:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579714638; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Kqd2i5jFU9YMqweb8D1Ou6YobukB75Iu6n5UZk/RuXup8Kjfw6xb5wP9/PTjzyolq4 h7KTXqCkQRaLx90keH8Z2CteQmB4yz0FSfhRoj08YcvuHqJDkWoND0RhXqxlArjsK2CZ S/DdGSen/ymIWsiit0wuQJanVTRps4DYQ5iSJDXBm1e7h8IdoR3GFjibU4mdGPRnBKvG n4qDqp3wZSaRwqWAeqxjaJncy3LjsschNmLfWWQYvRvVx0Y/i9fO5ly4+WQZx1QxEZZJ KrGRSTSvT+WwiSvKzvcGbhPOhzwAdzqvUxqa3Tj7eb5Fjoy8GQ0Tq9UwRRX4yD6Mhe1f Hhpg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=R5uuzmzD2YRXJbWZOJK8RRyCqyx6yIXIqis/LFdvq+A=; b=WZV1mbK+uiWCpI0aUnRk5XfJIAWZge9Hm1Bqplml3650MZ4C6OVFcyEO9APmb0zlx5 Sknbkf/WddRql5ZmLjpb/dCslHbx6g3eycfDadiBmpIdGB/XFcl6Wy/TT60XXQxUm8mm GwjRLf0vV1c752iEpDrMxwctEKWYawQ3KKBKuXY2qaOFN0UkleF5i6LuV/wMA7JksFWn q+MxM5kLSJfliiNOyA4Bgc5yqw41uVarSrqZDcJNriY8hQm6+N+lAbr57yZx8Vu6/OPk 8SqU7Jf18V4bOp2xgsULx5SikVhqRmudbAUwYOObaIhYNKoEE5byLZRmmEE3gUWa+eU3 3rOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d6si21069762oic.274.2020.01.22.09.37.07; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729162AbgAVRgL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:36:11 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58982 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725802AbgAVRgK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:36:10 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65781007; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107049-lin.arm.com (e107049-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 978323F6C4; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:36:08 -0800 (PST) From: Douglas RAILLARD To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: douglas.raillard@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, qperret@google.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 1/6] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:35:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20200122173538.1142069-2-douglas.raillard@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200122173538.1142069-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> References: <20200122173538.1142069-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org em_pd_get_higher_freq() returns a frequency greater or equal to the provided one while taking into account a given cost margin. It also skips inefficient OPPs that have a higher cost than another one with a higher frequency (ordering OPPs by cost or efficiency leads to the same result within a given CPU). The efficiency of an OPP is measured as efficiency=capacity/power. OPPs with the same efficiency are assumed to be equivalent, since they will consume as much energy for a given amount of work to do. That may take more or less time depending on the frequency, but will consume the same energy. Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index d249b88a4d5a..8855e6892724 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -159,6 +159,56 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) return pd->nr_cap_states; } +#define EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE 1024U + +/** + * em_pd_get_higher_freq() - Get the highest frequency that does not exceed the + * given cost margin compared to min_freq + * @pd : performance domain for which this must be done + * @min_freq : minimum frequency to return + * @cost_margin : allowed cost margin on the EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE scale. The + * maximum value of the scale maps to the highest cost in that perf domain. + * + * Return: the chosen frequency, guaranteed to be at least as high as min_freq. + */ +static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin) +{ + unsigned long max_cost; + unsigned long max_allowed_cost = 0; + struct em_cap_state *cs; + int i; + + if (!pd) + return min_freq; + + max_cost = pd->table[pd->nr_cap_states - 1].cost; + cost_margin = (cost_margin * max_cost) / EM_COST_MARGIN_SCALE; + + /* Compute the maximum allowed cost */ + for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_cap_states; i++) { + cs = &pd->table[i]; + if (cs->frequency >= min_freq) { + max_allowed_cost = cs->cost + cost_margin; + break; + } + } + + /* Find the highest frequency that will not exceed the cost margin */ + for (i = pd->nr_cap_states-1; i >= 0; i--) { + cs = &pd->table[i]; + if (cs->cost <= max_allowed_cost) + return cs->frequency; + } + + /* + * min_freq can be higher than the highest available frequency since + * map_util_freq() will multiply the minimum frequency by some amount. + * This can allow it to be higher than the maximum achievable frequency. + */ + return min_freq; +} + #else struct em_data_callback {}; #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { } @@ -181,6 +231,12 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) { return 0; } + +static inline unsigned long em_pd_get_higher_freq(struct em_perf_domain *pd, + unsigned long min_freq, unsigned long cost_margin) +{ + return min_freq; +} #endif #endif -- 2.24.1