Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5065595ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/VpV13YuEgG5yxRCxOqh5o8Lg1RKjCGOaI7b4izq0hNIH81E80h5SQu8bLE9ubpTS/keD X-Received: by 2002:a9d:68d3:: with SMTP id i19mr7773394oto.71.1579714732380; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579714732; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ugzde+TAfaHyfTTEna6pu2zDisTCV6QvTxBY19Zf52C0JsVeif+jsuBQBfleIYaaqb +VF2++UGerf8hUUPlhhUkaNPJOuI44vlgPGoFIQaCG+DHbNIA9xswK70jYI7+sGE09s2 hVO4K0CYH0mOJguMSq0h/2B+H6uF0OO+02OnAz6dGCqOP/BIAvaDm34kVrSYRJXo4683 7L+xQC+JEtKMvTs+3hcLLHmD1MgZrT9VbOkrA0IzO7fgMJZxzdhheMvZlmO1VlPLL11G NnsuGLwC16yHClIvsD1aMXyIbHR/oDdU8reSYf9SW6oDbj+P+KQeg3LHhQFrjwdzms3M jU2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Yw0bt+LWwS3vUbI/vdrXRVxhEU+TlbsyO8M18Fh64bo=; b=AEmA0YuPMikOPnnOEYfq86Gykj5MlZfigIaetdUYGWWOJ8OFsOfj/9pRgn38dvg/CB NG+tlKO/t6iSYik5IgB//16WHyJ8tk9y11YZCBqyzjpexhVLZWMT7YzlUFgfmefXMtle D7A4PvyTTNUXC4nLCnos+hO0NOC1gSBhmGj+zocJkRCHP7YbPeM11Vez/ncia7CGKPXQ kwKAgKLIGlTmy29G++YSSZJ/bipknRYn+2zZtcufnYeOUuXXnQkSAowRvpGnqY37ieHe Yx3//m9D7hSoOik6w2io2Am74R9tfl/A+NsPPGjJSYkvBqqwGgfGnqFhZiCpR6IA4l2f rvxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d17si19986554oij.136.2020.01.22.09.38.39; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729222AbgAVRgS (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:36:18 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59034 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726004AbgAVRgR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:36:17 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED08A11D4; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107049-lin.arm.com (e107049-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E3BC3F6C4; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) From: Douglas RAILLARD To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: douglas.raillard@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, qperret@google.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 4/6] sched/cpufreq: Introduce sugov_cpu_ramp_boost Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:35:36 +0000 Message-Id: <20200122173538.1142069-5-douglas.raillard@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200122173538.1142069-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> References: <20200122173538.1142069-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Use the utilization signals dynamic to detect when the utilization of a set of tasks starts increasing because of a change in tasks' behavior. This allows detecting when spending extra power for faster frequency ramp up response would be beneficial to the reactivity of the system. This ramp boost is computed as the difference between util_avg and util_est_enqueued. This number somehow represents a lower bound of how much extra utilization this tasks is actually using, compared to our best current stable knowledge of it (which is util_est_enqueued). When the set of runnable tasks changes, the boost is disabled as the impact of blocked utilization on util_avg will make the delta with util_est_enqueued not very informative. Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD --- kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 608963da4916..25a410a1ff6a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ struct sugov_cpu { unsigned long bw_dl; unsigned long max; + unsigned long ramp_boost; + unsigned long util_est_enqueued; + unsigned long util_avg; + /* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */ #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON unsigned long saved_idle_calls; @@ -183,6 +187,42 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, } } +static unsigned long sugov_cpu_ramp_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) +{ + return READ_ONCE(sg_cpu->ramp_boost); +} + +static unsigned long sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) +{ + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu); + unsigned long util_est_enqueued; + unsigned long util_avg; + unsigned long boost = 0; + + util_est_enqueued = READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.avg.util_est.enqueued); + util_avg = READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg); + + /* + * Boost when util_avg becomes higher than the previous stable + * knowledge of the enqueued tasks' set util, which is CPU's + * util_est_enqueued. + * + * We try to spot changes in the workload itself, so we want to + * avoid the noise of tasks being enqueued/dequeued. To do that, + * we only trigger boosting when the "amount of work" enqueued + * is stable. + */ + if (util_est_enqueued == sg_cpu->util_est_enqueued && + util_avg >= sg_cpu->util_avg && + util_avg > util_est_enqueued) + boost = util_avg - util_est_enqueued; + + sg_cpu->util_est_enqueued = util_est_enqueued; + sg_cpu->util_avg = util_avg; + WRITE_ONCE(sg_cpu->ramp_boost, boost); + return boost; +} + /** * get_next_freq - Compute a new frequency for a given cpufreq policy. * @sg_policy: schedutil policy object to compute the new frequency for. @@ -514,6 +554,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, busy = !sg_policy->need_freq_update && sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu); util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu); + sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(sg_cpu); max = sg_cpu->max; util = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, util, max); next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max); @@ -554,6 +595,8 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time) unsigned long j_util, j_max; j_util = sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu); + if (j_sg_cpu == sg_cpu) + sugov_cpu_ramp_boost_update(sg_cpu); j_max = j_sg_cpu->max; j_util = sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, j_util, j_max); -- 2.24.1