Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp5144552ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:09:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwrzfV6t67r0Qz6y17dNGjliYYqG4tXZZGfbZ1oM0p5ErwE4phTwTUIbBmKE3RsfbdnDsur X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:8cd:: with SMTP id k13mr7964258oij.4.1579720169338; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:09:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579720169; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RVTg63T07riJITrQQv53mvFvCrU4aW5XVyqdbChgMD3fyGSbyhp9pThTRk4Ui4bdd2 KW3aieKdrPerzpGPaQArje6vdANzSD++6sWoujNMNAVG497GzICj98AUZ3vwtIgGKJAt nj1UInZuP57HB+Yf4rOz7UmujegzLppqjJc9dADpkoqClbbBE7hQP//+p5gRNfi78BhQ ezvROUFJmeeq2av5FlaUxNTvlJFfMHr6zXM3YoxyxSGtalnuKGWCtCjjqOp07E8jgRQu gEl4ea4mXg/L1PJ5YDTOo4PamRk31x3jeiN7sGsx8zV5P8x9QYyMRbKcyJZiL+66tENV JB8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=dYMN7gBIqZeRy4xLjy+HxkQOGwZtH+rVll7sG5tgtZE=; b=qigP8cisxfMhGVdI4RVjgZLDZ6U8vv44kn47K9FYF0Gn6B49CIxQ3tGCjfBAWH7Dmk E3M3L/nDsNAQkzz8S0JD7Mg6WLpSbqAKJhCmo6opvLQNpzRCjqHLW8KxicRMatqZAQMZ 0as5nbMoY3iP1ZOeHhdrx42pysQyISvvvSVhOMsnFrOX8O7DrTAwUynU6F2GCZJC+uoV Md0CnyikYwhXCMfqDq16X2qoX3Qqs0NK50Ty6R5MsuduejObEatJd+8E5SHgWEcdUbXL iG+urbrvw90hhdWmY/UhSYrmdRgLc0b2Koqoiizd03WeNEgY2B7Fisw2FZVnxCgnADM2 ouIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si21546808oic.40.2020.01.22.11.09.16; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:09:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726227AbgAVTHK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34462 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725884AbgAVTHK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:10 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1864724655; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:07 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Scott Wood Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Julia Cartwright , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 24/32] sched: migrate_enable: Use stop_one_cpu_nowait() Message-ID: <20200122140707.6ac91fc8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <56d00d663e61abf7df7cdd91d8da98b4f9e5906e.camel@redhat.com> References: <20200117174111.282847363@goodmis.org> <20200117174131.019724236@goodmis.org> <20200122083130.kuu3yppckhyjrr4u@linutronix.de> <20200122063311.52b68472@gandalf.local.home> <56d00d663e61abf7df7cdd91d8da98b4f9e5906e.camel@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:39:14 -0600 Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 06:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:31:30 +0100 > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > On 2020-01-17 12:41:35 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > 4.19.94-rt39-rc1 stable review patch. > > > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > I don't know how much of this patch and the previous is classified as > > > "new feature" vs "bug fix". This patch requires patch 31 (of this > > > series) > > > as bug fix. > > > I'm not against it, just pointing out. > > > > > > > Hmm, the description looked more of a bug fix than a new feature. > > Yes, the state clobber was an existing bug. Patch 23 was a performance > improvement rather than a bugfix, though. > Some people consider performance improvements bug fixes ;-) -- Steve