Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp160301ybl; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:24:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFAhhUorHxCvhLQqbdtlssaD/8RHirOb9ZxojASc7xhJS6PmVAbVjVWvujRt7nciJxn1+y X-Received: by 2002:a9d:23b5:: with SMTP id t50mr9272095otb.122.1579746278058; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:24:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579746278; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AkanC1CKCEdbHX66llYrmBi/ic7E4iLO9tVsRPLX5fxd3oHOjU371/ybwND9gFljdD OkYbYettyKRrrtosSy7fe8mwzP8H+XP/CgXH9QM1lCvL/En+QlDQ81CqXFzrlcYPftwd RHDMTcdRGVvbfy+6YMsce35cwe+W4GDbxwlmzYA+oDF/qY3KkVgCTFMyDa+P7tSm7rCk +ypkCUDo+UcwfwYi/ncfmsstZ+PYAS6cAMzPp2hUXIsWRplwmTAr+yM3eefB5vGh/dgl 5/VQUT665pS+IheJyeFAtNWeuElEJ2GWfeE+mL2/sceZKXsmov5qC4obJnLTutd64mZY vUeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=cfSOjtYS4rLQfkETqk/xjea9kmEf0GUn36B+SElmJqQ=; b=Chl3txyLXdEF1uWFQNvCej+pzdvSCA7uT1oHg7P2pUFxveWPHpELmiOf6YUCvGnnfA 6O/hz/8NU6T8htfgz8C5MpCrGNF7bhi5TMfFWQxmbJPfC4kmqVJ9lkMda9u3s0GzkcS1 DS/MRnV+0dYefPzorlxGjNq2yd43ngT3xhWfNjcCoIvyfv7qKZQbPynkoP5c+AG5Kpa7 VfDdSE2bavBGvRvbB/OUUqJpshburYpr88AUEMN4iMbFroJ6qAC05cyKozI9VO5Vjkzm YUxZcHgopYBxITA6dUwHHhOSbxJIyK5h9WH1GtVPFME6WjymoYwRp0/6azcMTD9Bxn9v oNPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=akHRSSBW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a64si194137oif.256.2020.01.22.18.24.26; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:24:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=akHRSSBW; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726191AbgAWCXK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:23:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:52755 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725911AbgAWCXJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:23:09 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a6so464602pjh.2 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:23:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cfSOjtYS4rLQfkETqk/xjea9kmEf0GUn36B+SElmJqQ=; b=akHRSSBWCjQEzrr//88cCDuITRHPxItXqixMdVHnQLow0anXycM/NP5/8be6w5rOKH jBStSde7rBNq02I0FXzNoJ9vvkSx9xIFlZwDCrxG1BPa5JMXbEGY7mOtp2wy9jodvbJQ qIpcJauz4H4fsSrlemuBX1Fw478ve42bF9fxBW2xuimF8nuAFpir9IOBEWQIp83PZ1+H UYzFtAQPMaQfIBbwHL8xK5nBkG0DnlMBg5tgNH07d2mn33ftZori8MuTcumCvykHaIkx EIsxbEDCWWZlbpOwU5X9Nlq1QIzJldSEUPD+GuaWpIfShRWt8mabpxZb8vOC6CYnu29+ /CxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cfSOjtYS4rLQfkETqk/xjea9kmEf0GUn36B+SElmJqQ=; b=SWv5mr2kI5WfwB0unpOhx/HDPA1WIY7YZYX+ILxYmuEH2kRDNOj2xFpeBIzAbpP9AV oZJPvjm6JpK8ttNdCKMECiyguZ14XPaetUefCkfim7QRoVZFFqoxACnamqSERLmdw2Bu 8QZNeZg0CueLMKco4JmuBtJDNSjKeqrVysFr9H8xhI7hHmU3loti6IY2sSmP6EMA7U0g iTeveVCo4RdMXm+00xU07HnoVQDpV+2RSceqUCdrJjKU1rfCG3cUICenolSrPtr2xVyf 6+fnAnrWnj68Q9wLdVNjDgtjXgZH6zWowl3B/uPm1Pn1IUywOzDOAbqfuyzi3wB9a046 5Mwg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVvc023dVSeydWicD5mfh9CH9QWwOzqwWBC21Hs5WRvrCrpQ6EU hnsLzkYi3DvupsMASi/Z28o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd96:: with SMTP id q22mr13265756pls.318.1579746188861; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:1:3e01:2939:5992:52da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ep12sm313647pjb.7.2020.01.22.18.23.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:23:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:23:05 -0800 From: Minchan Kim To: Yue Hu Cc: ngupta@vflare.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huyue2@yulong.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: do not set ZRAM_IDLE bit for idlepage writeback in writeback_store() Message-ID: <20200123022305.GF249784@google.com> References: <20200121113557.11608-1-zbestahu@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200121113557.11608-1-zbestahu@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 07:35:57PM +0800, Yue Hu wrote: > From: Yue Hu > > Currently, we will call zram_set_flag() to set ZRAM_IDLE bit even for > idlepage writeback. That is pointless. Let's set it only for hugepage mode. Could you be more specific? What do you see the problem with that? > > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu > --- > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > index 4285e75..eef5767 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > @@ -689,16 +689,18 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct device *dev, > if (mode == IDLE_WRITEBACK && > !zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE)) > goto next; > - if (mode == HUGE_WRITEBACK && > - !zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_HUGE)) > - goto next; > + if (mode == HUGE_WRITEBACK) { > + if (!zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_HUGE)) > + goto next; > + /* Need for hugepage writeback racing */ > + zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE); > + } > + > /* > * Clearing ZRAM_UNDER_WB is duty of caller. > * IOW, zram_free_page never clear it. > */ > zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_UNDER_WB); > - /* Need for hugepage writeback racing */ > - zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE); > zram_slot_unlock(zram, index); > if (zram_bvec_read(zram, &bvec, index, 0, NULL)) { > zram_slot_lock(zram, index); > -- > 1.9.1 >