Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] fs/readdir: Fix filldir() and filldir64() use of user_access_begin()
In-Reply-To: <87muaeidyc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
References: <12a4be679e43de1eca6e5e2173163f27e2f25236.1579715466.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> <87muaeidyc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 23:00:09 +1100
Message-ID: <87k15iidrq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> This patch is independent of the rest of the series AFAICS

And of course having hit send I immediately realise that's not true.

> So I'll take patches 2-6 via powerpc and assume this patch will go via
> Linus or Al or elsewhere.

So I guess I'll wait and see what happens with patch 1.

cheers