Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp576729ybl; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:11:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwLiXMxi/exsixOSG93RlKm1ky6r4KiN5l+H3OcQ6y6NHr3UOnj97IyIRCOjX+Usf0w3Mge X-Received: by 2002:aca:388:: with SMTP id 130mr9795099oid.89.1579781504140; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:11:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579781504; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a+hcc6Yt6TQg0f+9CI9+FnASooEjF32AvDj4tUnPqw46EqKdgULXQbfUypTPqlMzDd DMBzgHC5Z5pw8Jj+LGVfHitJi6o5QzaRmNeJnio6qvmgeB9Fq1XzmHvw0iJlyZZreE+R 718B4k2o9qZyAW5we4dXaNElgzTxDpZL3Le3OlPYxjHOj/Q8FYHVdUJpt9W9ZGAQwzJz NUL+cQ1XkG3f97PJKhHekzQYEcTVxHDYxdYIjU55RM0xbCd6F0SViyG64wV2+wa1uenF BP7CyGEIzFiYtUi8/JlpvSgarQnpJuz+qupUCeEa2wKNZaEiEBTIXBftwRGq3vG920pj DAIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=4/4x2zrhD5Be7XKo3o6zGgq7CvPSF24+91f7wKdOObM=; b=slYc2ucyJMWR7ndb/DwvPE8F2rU0DjuyuRpLV2moWAOI6Fj3dUVLq9IA1RTc4f8Opl 2kNvGQ7O5XkGADiJBZQ6Kwb8cbHO9j7fseXp2dk/uwovn4qLErtq2nav6DzKhPPW6GRI pSybVSS6vIB7ISBw9VcalZ237XS9jAFz51zfDmGEDmBNRJCGFD/SH9TMNmnPUjGljiHI 1fxnzXT8qBJH/eKV0ufHEAY7NAX5vbWAGWraj7MZTIXmXsmDU4UazEn+d4c0hdEUdcOK qh6yM/VPv6vQnuLAJmllWCHcGRcFkezzr6Z/xeLLwRDC+WGROOI1A4ayL9TjqaK4W6Vg 3L4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q190si769725oic.187.2020.01.23.04.11.31; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726871AbgAWMJb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:09:31 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38672 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726026AbgAWMJb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:09:31 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBC5328; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:09:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C01673F6C4; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 04:09:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:09:29 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Charles Keepax Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] regulator: arizona-ldo1: Improve handling of regulator unbinding Message-ID: <20200123120929.GB5440@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200122110842.10702-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> <20200122131149.GE3833@sirena.org.uk> <20200123092639.GC4098@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> <20200123114805.GA5440@sirena.org.uk> <20200123120240.GD4098@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200123120240.GD4098@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> X-Cookie: ((lambda (foo) (bar foo)) (baz)) User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:02:40PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > I am more than happy to do the leg work if we really don't like > this solution. Do either you or Lee have any thoughts on my > selective MFD remove helpers? That seemed like the most promising > alternative solution to me. That's my first thought if you need to control removal order which is basically what's going on here. --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl4pjPgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Di+wf/QzyKud67CmftD46xQMkjZjkU2gbmqkitDbuJOuipbmsdSUHDVq5cNPkz u4ziJUNrR73n6DTevWU4mslN0TaSJM6kFrd0DWWn6+uZpcUTB7fNITZv3K85H9Tj tIHFqy07S/fOxJjdVUZab2sBkh8d3q6BbbDubAN+EZOHghg0pA3horGAOOLMg3aA mR5Wlawv7VJDSfgOuFCG4J2fTohNC6zxwuczacO/SjOtxssUJkvRZHscIC6CqBmG xsN9mRn/qZIzw6BDI8r8YhCRYcvslOnFQKCg0TiM3ejwog2uof0OYHpxo4WzTBVL 074WnIkvGca7/WuEj4ICJ32K5Bn16Q== =L8iY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi--