Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200115012651.228058-1-almasrymina@google.com>
 <20200115012651.228058-7-almasrymina@google.com> <7ce6d59f-fd73-c529-2ad6-edda9937966d@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <7ce6d59f-fd73-c529-2ad6-edda9937966d@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:05:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHS8izNmhxja_0+b2DudpXB+1DQfpnjUu+Qak+wnsApgYrvU=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/8] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests
To:     Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, shuah <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:15 AM Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> For powerpc64, either 16MB/16GB or 2MB/1GB huge pages are supported depending
> on the MMU type (Hash or Radix). I was just running these tests on a powerpc64
> system with Hash MMU and ran into problems because the tests assume that the
> hugepage size is always 2MB. Can you determine the huge page size at runtime?
>

Absolutely. Let me try to reproduce this failure and it should be
fixed in the next patchset version.