Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423432AbWBBJyJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:54:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423429AbWBBJyI (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:54:08 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:60646 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161125AbWBBJyG (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:54:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:54:05 +0100 From: Martin Mares To: Joerg Schilling Cc: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James@superbug.co.uk, j@bitron.ch, acahalan@gmail.com Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: References: <43D7B1E7.nailDFJ9MUZ5G@burner> <20060125230850.GA2137@merlin.emma.line.org> <43D8C04F.nailE1C2X9KNC@burner> <43DDFBFF.nail16Z3N3C0M@burner> <1138642683.7404.31.camel@juerg-pd.bitron.ch> <43DF3C3A.nail2RF112LAB@burner> <43DF65C8.nail3B41650J9@burner> <43E1D417.nail4MI11WTFI@burner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43E1D417.nail4MI11WTFI@burner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1641 Lines: 39 Hello! > Is there any reason why the people with small PCs should dominate the > people with big machines? > > If you use /dev/hd*, you loose control after you add more than ~ 6-10 disks. And this is why the current Linux naming scheme (udev etc.) gives you the possibility to use both types of names. When I have a single CD writer, it's silly to have to think about where exactly it is connected. I refer to it as /dev/cdrw and everything is easy. When I have multiple writers, I start to care about more -- but usually it's still better to avoid using bus addresses (they are not too stable -- after changing disks, I often end up with connecting my 2 CDWR's to different controllers) and use udev to maintain stable naming. I use /dev/cdrom-upper and /dev/cdrom-lower, which are assigned based on manufacturer and serial number. This is even easier to remember with a big amount of hardware :-) And, which is more important, this scheme works for everything -- drives, mice, network interfaces and so on. I don't see any reason why cdrecord on Linux should invent a different naming scheme, especially as nobody has so far demonstrated any of its advantages. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth MIPS: Meaningless Indicator of Processor Speed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/