Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1167257ybl; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzs4G3hmzUi5ex0kCgdG1/4577KMzqoI10jCKsVtbLI6cAWMoueMuzShokvZuctXbjtRqie X-Received: by 2002:aca:2112:: with SMTP id 18mr162749oiz.155.1579820609884; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579820609; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=feyDxSWzPjC+ll1i5HpkpdrALNN3ZXEI5naK9WOIFhchlqf2nS6UjAIHJ/9OqAzVem E/w8ujU/0wJNO6D5brPtryQ0GByrreU0wcIXzB3DB1lMrSjjjzScNaGVFfanhqXl+OAy 7kNMWnrBGl/xqN5wFXG9FnP6lpGSF01eWBSEYPtovDq0JxG5eGMVfY/b+F44mO5YNUUH 9jlsmTTzJVOyB/1wOTuTKzECO+fOfZtXl/P/pO+4qRP6lqUflYgerkldexXDvOyKMrW3 lOJVwR0cGGCzzpXtmGcrPHVKEEM+jy/3EKoxexMdZi9kH11QKA2nYlpfUrUpsqCaNYdQ ISzA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=F8ZzCtJs5Bq/8ts7oh1j1QdaS1UijoLZd+5gBtMNbho=; b=AOmzN5D75mfQgY8bchB1svgNmKjqbnD1PnolOi7uia1GeXn+h1K4TUAZofOSSQOK/u m0owTQdBoLRb1R+O378riD2qwzdhyJTZlajVLgwGmg/jz6U7INoUwB7u/C9NlVbsNPV/ 2LLypc9X3O7caDnbvOl7IRhBs2ynaTWwoHT90IgD0DzQbzJOtaKpvNxCgZ+gT3lBAPpq lga7kdrNczk96yDVHUyjk6TN5BUUn60kj85gcU3YQUE8DNIShiYtzGYavNlGX+LJKXnh hON7IgHumUi+05E+xMZ+CnDsdkXgneeA2bCHQlbo7ZhV3tIvDfOaQpiQx9sHOxsQrAjx ZYig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q2si1718215otn.220.2020.01.23.15.03.11; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729588AbgAWW77 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:59:59 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:60764 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727061AbgAWW76 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:59:58 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2020 14:59:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,355,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="290005495" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2020 14:59:28 -0800 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 06:59:40 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Yang Shi Cc: mhocko@suse.com, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: move_pages: report the number of non-attempted pages Message-ID: <20200123225940.GC29851@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1579736331-85494-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1579736331-85494-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:38:51AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote: >Since commit a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move"), >the semantic of move_pages() was changed to return the number of >non-migrated pages (failed to migration) and the call would be aborted >immediately if migrate_pages() returns positive value. But it didn't >report the number of pages that we even haven't attempted to migrate. >So, fix it by including non-attempted pages in the return value. > >Fixes: a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move") >Suggested-by: Michal Hocko >Cc: Wei Yang >Cc: [4.17+] >Signed-off-by: Yang Shi >--- >v2: Rebased on top of the latest mainline kernel per Andrew > > mm/migrate.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c >index 86873b6..9b8eb5d 100644 >--- a/mm/migrate.c >+++ b/mm/migrate.c >@@ -1627,8 +1627,18 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, > start = i; > } else if (node != current_node) { > err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node); >- if (err) >+ if (err) { >+ /* >+ * Positive err means the number of failed >+ * pages to migrate. Since we are going to >+ * abort and return the number of non-migrated >+ * pages, so need incude the rest of the >+ * nr_pages that have not attempted as well. >+ */ >+ if (err > 0) >+ err += nr_pages - i - 1; > goto out; >+ } > err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start); > if (err) > goto out; >@@ -1659,8 +1669,11 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, > goto out_flush; > > err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node); >- if (err) >+ if (err) { >+ if (err > 0) >+ err += nr_pages - i - 1; > goto out; >+ } > if (i > start) { > err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start); > if (err) >@@ -1674,6 +1687,13 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, > > /* Make sure we do not overwrite the existing error */ > err1 = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node); >+ /* >+ * Don't have to report non-attempted pages here since: In previous comment, you use "non-migrated". Here is "non-attempted". What's the difference? >+ * - If the above loop is done gracefully there is not non-attempted >+ * page. >+ * - If the above loop is aborted to it means more fatal error >+ * happened, should return err. >+ */ > if (!err1) > err1 = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start); > if (!err) >-- >1.8.3.1 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me