Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750767AbWBBLQm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:16:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750773AbWBBLQm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:16:42 -0500 Received: from uproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.92.199]:61076 "EHLO uproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbWBBLQl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:16:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ak15Jjcm+BZc5LiAyJS23BEw6mb7xK9kow0MQ16T/B74GAM6hQBbAbgYWd7K6W61vSCTLgHexHGM+AXGqjfomCYOXCAN6RqhAexqmhYj3UfOheHYLj9c/gKKLUpBau7F4GfZGz78FQKrnxDWV7cqChKesoBLRgEXdEJeK4ABUx8= Message-ID: <84144f020602020316x1a996f74u8099df2696c716b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:16:40 +0200 From: Pekka Enberg To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h Cc: Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060202110235.GE1884@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602012245.06328.nigel@suspend2.net> <84144f020602010501k23e7898at82c0f231a2da0ad4@mail.gmail.com> <200602020730.16916.nigel@suspend2.net> <84144f020602011345i2e395336s371786c441b9f5b2@mail.gmail.com> <20060202100646.GC1981@elf.ucw.cz> <84144f020602020257g72bda32bkc3d6264495bea2aa@mail.gmail.com> <20060202110235.GE1884@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1016 Lines: 25 Hi, On St 01-02-06 23:45:15, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > So what's the plan for short-term? Are userspace suspend and suspend > > modules mutually exclusive or can they co-exist? On 2/2/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > They can coexist for as long as neccessary. (At one point, it was even > possible to suspend using userland code, then resume using kernel code > :-). > > When I found out noone is really using kernel code any more (2.8.0 or > something), I'd like to get rid of it. So are you saying we should pursue merging Suspend2 bits in the mainline and deprecate it when userspace is mature enough and has all the same features? Seems counter-productive but then again I am mostly clueless of suspend issues. Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/