Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200123165934.9584-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123165934.9584-3-lmb@cloudflare.com>
 <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CACAyw9_OGBbsXepTcp=1frEHB7Q2cD9BVXTbgt7Ci_eFyV2Egg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests
To:     Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
        "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
>
> btw, it needs a Fixes tag.
>
> Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag.

This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have
to split the series then?

-- 
Lorenz Bauer  |  Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK

www.cloudflare.com