Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp417775ybl; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:52:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyA0v+k7teyOpCdwcFSwejB4wivmApULC1leRG+iWxidhIzHOYqvMOSvaT03etswOK3DvN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:4c2:: with SMTP id a2mr1524317oie.118.1579863163018; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:52:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579863163; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BTs5IIsrJHYpD9eljWOCCOiMmxaLhkuewzpvHfkXavmMoZ+UNcXQZnIDNdbesj3bAR DvPvPft4LDEVz87wgsBICpXOc7DetbhKi1X78ssXZqPdlqe25Mchmtx9nSRK4A0SxATi t0sxjhOTB4iwpkactwmKWV9ntPgUiEmumjutM4YiSkSOULfr4lrTOwgXc3BzdZmV8ufo Z6N9/H1sA7I5bxGLF23kN0NEzc/xnX4UKLmMxNjlhj8BTe3oHjHixFgoWHeZiG/9CcMN lZpF3a3YNuij75bMqOa/uu7wG+O6PJB3dXE5LnF9HR732PmApvyobEhvgekXXR+gbwKN XDEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=JshjkGrduR3O+qhVmSwutBCHU7qy7nAaJczGAuoTqjs=; b=ff467Qh//bLLBaPA8V27hmpriBL2vw4Akhh9VSfDfk9yjlIgldO+QQvRFhK4uMF0NH DCmfrffOn0ZntPv5veELeXSGiO8y9Z5iUYurcAUqFbSVz8jiWEb8m/ul+HReLcq6b7Kj gcIehQp0oHQzOvcvNbqgHsebC2o2SFUGzq/8xeCQ2KOcNa94vBz6O7dFQHL1O8+yaFur M4cc5VEfGUa+xmo+eMlhBpcPEPKDz/4xNZjSQ83L50qXUQbI6PjVlAzpotmhrcltbAR7 IyFdHDOzUhGsdYXdhsAiyBnZxq/K9Uyg2zUqHu//1DVK1XmOnqla8R9femZ6Yom2V28R OWDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15si2753375otp.314.2020.01.24.02.52.31; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 02:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729262AbgAXJcd (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:32:33 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:45784 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbgAXJcd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 04:32:33 -0500 Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuvKG-0006Dq-UV; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:29 +0100 Received: from [2001:1620:665:0:5795:5b0a:e5d5:5944] (helo=linux-3.fritz.box) by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iuvKG-000Bp8-I2; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:28 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests To: Lorenz Bauer , Martin Lau Cc: Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20200123165934.9584-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123165934.9584-3-lmb@cloudflare.com> <20200123215348.zql3d5xpg2if7v6q@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.101.4/25704/Thu Jan 23 12:37:43 2020) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/24/20 10:00 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau wrote: >> >> btw, it needs a Fixes tag. >> >> Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag. > > This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have > to split the series then? Lets do all of these for bpf-next since timing is very close before v5.5 release. If needed, we can later have them picked up for 5.5 stable. Thanks, Daniel