Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp972596ybl; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:59:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSr3wDN7UkpjLU8KMm0aifZXB+faQoHvULLBUSDjbt74R3jipZhjGCA8aF9PI/mBJoxarm X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7999:: with SMTP id h25mr4139836otm.347.1579899592175; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:59:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579899592; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z9srOmEiPxg2kPjSrM/nXU104Z5a/Mn2fiYg7O6dnIzj5RQhXCHyC/+94N3YJj+1VI eeWn9gdhc17CtO4sGZVEokSjtjnCnnAdoEdXz/9cdM9T47TZEywQYJ2PYcqEDQVA1vwy woxIz7a0riShPULlxo5T+UoNenYTUZ9ov5G/PtXwHi0y6GlFoeGzyPWWhQW+TLzUbN4q iGbtXwQBEicNlaek2pbg0U+r0BlF1MVv7BBiMLQMq1EO2CJiaQHrQMZe1Q3praYT3ach Z9PAWyp/gpoh/bmnqYvj7apy1Bc6Gi1AgdwhvZBM69t6xr9NZ+M5riG1tQHTTmBKCBe+ QJKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=v4oPTR2YZWxHlL+tTFjcNkmCCof+ja1sD/+qaxtlzAA=; b=HLqqlq3sDO8k4yIg50FbIZ0EC+HjBoYJre8JqJ8iPD+7iTOuxcRTkKTpAVbRij1kVV YN5cbYEwvPZbB9ppWUAs+sLix/HaqfWdPW4Ce6xvpNowgxyotwybOWTQ8TttbBoOgw2w +zIDAEe8xKXTuDyJDt84m59qNI8siPaGV6R/STqHKGBWQrwia9q6/g+T8g+Zy0ak8ohh +KJLnn1F2u1d5qubuexdyFEcS4rjWiDFBOQB/efBTOaW55QWSGlbLKUWBc7j9wcpegfX UR0Fg/ItfFytDQ2t6Y7g7KwolDcYsPjhql61AscdpRPKKH4bmvtmecEzVtcpj5T089ZK 27Lw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=n3qnwZz0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k19si3224653otr.52.2020.01.24.12.59.40; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:59:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=n3qnwZz0; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403760AbgAXSH5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:07:57 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:11334 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391024AbgAXSH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:07:56 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:41 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:55 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:55 -0800 Received: from [10.21.133.51] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:07:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/639] 4.19.99-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: , , , , , , , , , linux-tegra References: <20200124093047.008739095@linuxfoundation.org> <23f2a904-3351-4a75-aaaf-2623dc55d114@nvidia.com> <20200124173659.GD3166016@kroah.com> From: Jon Hunter Message-ID: <8a782263-aca3-3846-12a0-4eb21f015894@nvidia.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:07:51 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200124173659.GD3166016@kroah.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1579889261; bh=v4oPTR2YZWxHlL+tTFjcNkmCCof+ja1sD/+qaxtlzAA=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=n3qnwZz0CZL/XmU/8R8VCRRVCRsOhZ88HDYYtAW9jlgbr9XmN5nngUFcSPzgZNBtx OEeg5I+J/ZNNbaTMCnEEluRm2AnsFIa5ttlIrk3Q7WJ4n9rhUS+iBNMXj9QmFZ4nKd vggSxpi7XFeFpMPHRM+Hc0iyA80zkEnn8MlMcO9h5lbFrTIwFvkFZPBEAx/GRf3+Cc eX2vQLlJghbufGAWiXOFk5/4pgoLuuumFkpoyYp+MULaWLXC+qh3C8PQ8/Xi1pJZeZ tJNrQKY61A9awhsZ8lgXaWvCVHQKc5tOlOyX7ZLYzjXZCJS/gWfUg4FI0PVBNKc9fg t4/8wCnrvA+pg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/01/2020 17:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 02:50:05PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 24/01/2020 09:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.99 release. >>> There are 639 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Jan 2020 09:26:29 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.99-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >>> ------------- >>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: >> >> ... >> >>> Rafael J. Wysocki >>> PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle >> >> The above commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra124 Jetson-TK1. >> Reverting this on top of v4.19.99-rc1 fixes the issue. > > This is also in the 4.14 queue, so should I drop it there too? I did not see any failures with the same board on that branch, so I would say no, but odd that it only fails here. It was failing for me 100% so I would have expected to see if there too if it was a problem. Jon -- nvpublic