Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:03:45 -0800
From:   Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ide/MIPS/docs: remove no longer used au1xxx-ide
 driver
Message-ID: <20200124230345.m3i223nazraoont3@pburton-laptop>
References: <CGME20200116122951eucas1p1d36493f2b496bb13dca4fd1a17abad49@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <20200116122938.20789-1-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200116122938.20789-1-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi David & Jonathan,

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Since patch #2 depends on patch #1 (and it is also the best to
> apply patch #3 after driver code removal) it would be probably
> easiest to merge everything through MIPS tree (after getting
> necessary ACKs, from David for the first patch and Jonathan for
> the third one).

Does that sound good to you? If so could you ack the patches as
appropriate?

Alternatively I have no problem if you'd rather take this through the
IDE tree David, in which case for patch 2:

    Acked-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>

Thanks,
    Paul