Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1441917ybl; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:30:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKAKyaHAy0pSHrZIkuPyzF2qxIZoiruYo/7wG8fcPBN5GFrGY6GAIr28nUZEwn/1yfVuMc X-Received: by 2002:aca:c494:: with SMTP id u142mr1921735oif.86.1579941040507; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:30:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1579941040; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T+76W7/hQ5QtgK3AfxX4tmiQgZ6zFnMlMzyv53tLlkfEQy/dMUswofuAorTBVmtFjW rPEdW+Grd7wcumQnnHbdJMDrJ3qouff1j/4+cwBjbe4N/8YM7HmvX201BrcKJDbCpPHX Ta5bufh+/Rzst+OHxlcuq2b0CJlDkWpG0Yj74CEZhp5l+KzaiTM7W2k5QwLHYNhrkts3 5Hqzx5S30pznIt3LTdhbQPVd8QIRTrtCQkpzanhxCQNrFEQWBpWcqky0QT1sArsgWSaL xPmbaup3mqqBuCU33uQF0CW+VWmdNBQNqa6PC6kjhyZhJCG4ab4caes5vZwLwIlL9xPy 4JqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=VdQ3Inv8NJiayWFI0yER8FJgX6Za9jV99c+5ALxeT+g=; b=WalvhVbJJE0gfIpsr0ZMN1S87K9megT2nHyAdcybJU5+klgvo4avq3ZUlzUgOIWHC4 V3YTWxBbOJ42qZeG4AO3A7TDT1bTu6j06VSqTGYwjtDwyzLMNiQYATmQ4RVCa6JTCQxf QZG3Bxxd2HSVtVcMZV063qG05PozScEv+YC0vs01z15FkLFdXHPXyIhETjBXL1RMrymt edfenk8ToK83nvmjay1IsfQ0jyOKeHLvh8GdM9jhzd6kVlD12Ffbiahqms7yxF0j+5oZ +jvt01MngHNdfDUxM33CPAexhHDEyWCurlVZGDU8GkoSFZeYvp2ems+h7OhW6iYpioOn C3IQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e22si4379971otj.38.2020.01.25.00.29.54; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 00:30:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729019AbgAYI1y (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 03:27:54 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:51044 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726293AbgAYI1y (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 03:27:54 -0500 Received: from vvs-ws.sw.ru ([172.16.24.21]) by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ivGmu-0006Pc-Mj; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:27:28 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] seq_file .next functions should increase position index To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , NeilBrown , Waiman Long , Ingo Molnar , Peter Oberparleiter References: <244674e5-760c-86bd-d08a-047042881748@virtuozzo.com> <20200124105024.18d24572@gandalf.local.home> From: Vasily Averin Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:27:27 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200124105024.18d24572@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/24/20 6:50 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:36 +0300 > Vasily Averin wrote: > >> >> I've sent patches into maillists of affected subsystems already, >> this patch-set fixes the problem in files related to >> pstore, tracing, gcov, sysvipc and other subsystems processed >> via linux-kernel@ mailing list directly > > Since you sent the patches out individually, and not as the usually way > of replying to the 0/7 patch (this email), do you expect the patches to > just be accepted by the individual maintainers, and not as a series? Yes, you are right, I've missed it. Could you please review tracing-related patches of this patch set? >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 >> >> Vasily Averin (7): >> pstore_ftrace_seq_next should increase position index >> gcov_seq_next should increase position index >> t_next should increase position index >> fpid_next should increase position index >> eval_map_next should increase position index >> trigger_next should increase position index >> sysvipc_find_ipc should increase position index >> >> fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +- >> ipc/util.c | 2 +- >> kernel/gcov/fs.c | 2 +- >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 ++++++--- >> kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 +--- >> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 5 +++-- >> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >