Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932309AbWBBVuz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:50:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932313AbWBBVuz (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:50:55 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:12951 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932309AbWBBVuy (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:50:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:52:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: neilb@suse.de, kraxel@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4 i386 atomic operations broken on SMP (in modules at least) Message-Id: <20060202135205.08d91b76.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200602021314_MC3-1-B765-7FAF@compuserve.com> References: <200602021314_MC3-1-B765-7FAF@compuserve.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1655 Lines: 41 Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote: > > In-Reply-To: <17377.24090.486443.865483@cse.unsw.edu.au> > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 at 12:19:22 +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > My guess is there is there is something wrong with the 'alternative' > > stuff which strips out the lock prefix, but I couldn't see anything > > obviously wrong. The CPUs don't have FEATURE_UP (see below) so it > > cannot possibly be removing the 'lock' prefix... but it certainly acts > > like it is. > > Look closer: > > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm > > constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl cid xtpr > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > SMP alternatives is re-using the constant_tsc X86 feature bit. > > --- 2.6.16-rc1-mm4-386.orig/include/asm-i386/cpufeature.h > +++ 2.6.16-rc1-mm4-386/include/asm-i386/cpufeature.h > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ > #define X86_FEATURE_P4 (3*32+ 7) /* P4 */ > #define X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC (3*32+ 8) /* TSC ticks at a constant rate */ > > -#define X86_FEATURE_UP (3*32+ 8) /* smp kernel running on up */ > +#define X86_FEATURE_UP (3*32+ 9) /* smp kernel running on up */ > > /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */ > #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3 (4*32+ 0) /* Streaming SIMD Extensions-3 */ Darn, how did you spot that? Should `feature_up' appear in /proc/cpuinfo? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/