Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S276585AbRJPSLv>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:11:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S276601AbRJPSLm>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:11:42 -0400
Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:31248 "HELO
	netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S276585AbRJPSL0>;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:11:26 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:11:44 -0200 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: <riel@imladris.surriel.com>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: safemode <safemode@speakeasy.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VM
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110160932370.6108-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110161610170.6440-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, David Lang wrote:

> when 2.4 works it is FAR better then 2.2 and it has features not
> available on 2.2, but with the Rik VM (versions that were in the linus
> kernels up through 2.4.9) it has not reliably worked.

Note that Linus hasn't been up to date on my VM since
about 2.4.5.  And before you blame me for not sending
patches, I did send them but Linus didn't apply them
for unknown reasons.

The VM in Alan's kernel pretty much has been the only
option for a reliable 2.4 kernel since 2.4.7.

regards,

Rik
-- 
DMCA, SSSCA, W3C?  Who cares?  http://thefreeworld.net/  (volunteers needed)

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/