Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932393AbWBBWm3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:42:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932388AbWBBWm3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:42:29 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:53520 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932393AbWBBWm2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:42:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:42:13 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Dave Jones , Michael Loftis , David Weinehall , Doug McNaught , Russell King , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dtor_core@ameritech.net, James Courtier-Dutton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE? Message-ID: <20060202224212.GC8712@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <5793EB6F192350088E0AC4CE@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com> <87slrio9wd.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org> <25D702FB62516982999D7084@d216-220-25-20.dynip.modwest.com> <20060202121653.GI20484@vasa.acc.umu.se> <67A0AFFBC77C32B9DEE25EFA@dhcp-2-206.wgops.com> <20060202201008.GD11831@redhat.com> <20060202220519.GA8712@mars.ravnborg.org> <20060202221023.GJ11831@redhat.com> <20060202221922.GB8712@mars.ravnborg.org> <20060202223156.GK11831@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060202223156.GK11831@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1267 Lines: 27 On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:31:56PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:19:22PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 davej davej 1753 Dec 15 23:31 linux-2.6-bzimage.patch > > > > > > To get around some gynamstics in the rpm spec, defining a seperate build target > > > for every arch, we make every arch grok 'bzImage'. Fugly, but it keeps the > > > spec cleaner to maintain. > > > > Yup - seen it before. Did not like it. > > Consistent use of KBUILD_IMAGE across relevant architectures should buy > > you the same simplicity and a mergeable approach. > > tbh, patches like this just sit there, as 'they just work', rarely need > rediffing, the benefit to other people of it being upstream are next to nil > (or someone else would've done it by now), and I'm more motivated to work on > real problems like finding out why we've 3 different flavours of slab corruption right now. Fair enough. I expected you to ask me to do it ;-) Good luck with the slab stuff. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/