Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:41:14 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] console: Don't perform test for CON_BRL flag twice
Message-ID: <20200127024114.GC100275@google.com>
References: <20200124155733.54799-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200124155733.54799-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (20/01/24 17:57), Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[..]
> +++ b/drivers/accessibility/braille/braille_console.c
> @@ -369,10 +369,10 @@ int braille_register_console(struct console *console, int index,
>  
>  int braille_unregister_console(struct console *console)
>  {
> -	if (braille_co != console)
> -		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (!(console->flags & CON_BRL))
>  		return 0;
> +	if (braille_co != console)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	unregister_keyboard_notifier(&keyboard_notifier_block);
>  	unregister_vt_notifier(&vt_notifier_block);
>  	braille_co = NULL;
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/braille.c b/kernel/printk/braille.c
> index 17a9591e54ff..2ec42173890f 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/braille.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/braille.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,5 @@ _braille_register_console(struct console *console, struct console_cmdline *c)
>  int
>  _braille_unregister_console(struct console *console)
>  {
> -	if (console->flags & CON_BRL)
> -		return braille_unregister_console(console);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return braille_unregister_console(console);
>  }

Hmm, I don't know. This moves sort of important code from common upper
layer down to particular driver implementation. Should there be another
driver/super-braille.c it must test CON_BRL flag as well.
Because printk invokes _braille_unregister_console() unconditionally,
and _braille_unregister_console() unconditionally calls into the driver.

I guess we can remove CON_BRL from braille_unregister_console() instead,
because printk tests it.

	-ss