Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing 0/1] test: add epoll test case
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc:     io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200127161701.153625-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <d409ad33-2122-9500-51f4-37e9748f1d73@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:26:41 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200127161701.153625-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/27/20 9:17 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> I wrote the test case for epoll.
> 
> Since it fails also without sqpoll (Linux 5.4.13-201.fc31.x86_64),
> can you take a look to understand if the test is wrong?
> 
> Tomorrow I'll travel, but on Wednesday I'll try this test with the patch
> that I sent and also with the upstream kernel.

I'll take a look, but your patches are coming through garbled and don't
apply.

-- 
Jens Axboe