Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:00:28 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH liburing 0/1] test: add epoll test case
Message-ID: <20200127180028.f7s5xhhizii3dsnr@steredhat>
References: <20200127161701.153625-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
 <d409ad33-2122-9500-51f4-37e9748f1d73@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d409ad33-2122-9500-51f4-37e9748f1d73@kernel.dk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:26:41AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/27/20 9:17 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> > I wrote the test case for epoll.
> > 
> > Since it fails also without sqpoll (Linux 5.4.13-201.fc31.x86_64),
> > can you take a look to understand if the test is wrong?
> > 
> > Tomorrow I'll travel, but on Wednesday I'll try this test with the patch
> > that I sent and also with the upstream kernel.
> 
> I'll take a look, but your patches are coming through garbled and don't
> apply.

Weird, I'm using git-publish as usual. I tried to download the patch
received from the ML, and I tried to reapply and it seams to work here.

Which kind of issue do you have? (just to fix my setup)

Anyway I pushed my tree here:
    https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/liburing.git epoll