Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3782193ybl; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTlOLND8px+E1+Cd7BqOejN9/tauFZUKNrY7O7kSS4zwOIuQU5EWQF/qDPwvZ3LVZhNTZR X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c0d:: with SMTP id f13mr12865696otq.354.1580149085580; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580149085; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AHMRg76UfJXowkou2mFX3LhWNcRibJebz0cHImSziiB6GptocK6ljLh7cYdjfP2J64 /6oOqS+dXkEZ0tLlwyhS3snbrXbeBlba/JUfGU+zHBAG10cO10t8NB523u8vhQHxoDX6 IF7Mm+DY7F0wpa254sxSTz9bH1WXFrhA91/cVdCErSk9SPlvGkuBEdFfrlwneCvLObfg K0NqqfG7aZVCUdCRG/YbFlQMmUaEOqBGPjv/IDOcuHuExwXUFbT+h+DkSBCXCNrf83/2 2nJ2Xg9E4rsSG2InPELXSh8CntTDIBGUxfLswNFdhOMgqYXNTWcHrZP5QaVmRSLGxHm/ 6zgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=XqtwUYZJwyB0oZj5JYsEFhb/W5ziGXPkjmhyU1HZnpQ=; b=jkKHsnguWgQqybcEk6LaesqyqVi148dUTq+m6/hk8jZxwyZ90OBM1MB/Q0X8PHuB86 u1lQlb+m75myNmxpQVgfsYW6lkTxw/V8JBrrZ6UKiSNxbJOZDMFtQDoFrHq0JALxAKOs hT9dXKIdbb7KJRgyiIeP1qHnaWe5VsWcdpMXRA3y4mK0jG6GcKHOqevZXADkkvokTpfw kc0zx5V0jSnG/pMMMWsplG1/c8YE3mhA+CMBfkCIyqv8LrPvDCvOoPnqRa2XWW33fqXE bmPn6zMBPDeEqEfQyCS1UIxd2VhrTJWI2SKktArzjzDh6yqp5xk3/G05ZIrzxrsJ4xni kC6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u84si3916483oib.34.2020.01.27.10.17.53; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726145AbgA0SQY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:16:24 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:25914 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725828AbgA0SQY (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:16:24 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00RIFEWT046661 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:16:22 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xrjr4je58-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:16:21 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:20 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:17 -0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00RIGGeB60948548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:16 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F89A4040; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0442AA4055; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.185.238]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:16:15 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot aggregate From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Jerry Snitselaar , James Bottomley , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:16:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1580140919-6127-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20012718-0012-0000-0000-000003812734 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20012718-0013-0000-0000-000021BD7810 Message-Id: <1580148975.5088.38.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-27_06:2020-01-24,2020-01-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001270146 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 17:38 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity- > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mimi Zohar > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:02 PM > > To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar ; James Bottomley > > ; linux- > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mimi Zohar > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the > > boot aggregate > > Hi Mimi > > I did a similar change (patch 8/8) in the patch set I just sent. The patch is simpler, > as it reuses the data structures I introduced in the previous patches. Let me know > if I can keep this part in my patch set or I should remove it. Only 2/2 "ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on different TPM banks" is really needed to address Jerry's bug report.  Let's review your patch set before making any decisions about 1/2 "ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot aggregate". thanks, Mimi