Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3797395ybl; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:37:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6Rwv48XetVTIZWD1S0aaq3BoF+/lQtg9KyXwq4G1UNVA9y84t8xj0PiXpECLNGxvdkm7p X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c9:: with SMTP id t9mr5082041otq.177.1580150230321; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:37:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580150230; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WU9imMeiE2VTAIxL1D8QXBfukOFgiMfP9vr5fFWdFrDOlrxoGsrBRXR4ha/+Pgk3Ta 79BZGEGqwkucq4CZYFPT9MNlB6sb46aAfnkK22prWYbDXEw8T7TYwSGlL5Oopc4IKFNA 0ojgWlZLBtdsvWvUuarKjIF7CLwN2+qmOLgnyEEoQ6F2TcaSzmrF4ab1zgrgEviR+EYx EKavlwKn+ZFeJqbeTL2N6NZqx5Ri45qAn2ah0dmes/VJjyyVx7ETcjjV6rX7Gobp/Ute EODOs4Msa3lZPm296xVKDZ1KjCo1hy4R0AkcxonC/ZgclLKiAwM3Z9IYYTd9LGRrBuDN IzZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=vq5QQC0FdJyjZX6P4S4rGavoaCyGQetcAG/5LJHmCTo=; b=Ba+iggFIOhqATxZAgajGn4nPj642l48FM/sFHk8r1wZMyjfRC6oV2xNYZezJwev+6Q R6yhPJzghz5QXj7l0PwjDc8aSfCEt4JP2ShEjaesbyjTxseZgjYQjO8+8VBWyv2GowfT JIG2h06QlIvOYAKYNpoaLEw8tus71sdeMmGqL8dSeFNfAaUYkuSmFvOJaXUnZk13Z1Lb fgME5f1jTQqEXW4YKkSbWdECaZzzv/0XNEhdRs6sdLXDsrwzXOb0ktaHHE84r1xSAiCd H9Yi6M0bVKOwr7auRNMdXauYOlR6YtoXFjgbkDdy7NpSY1kfO2V8xjr8w1sGcOO7Mouk Qr/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 17si7586872otv.149.2020.01.27.10.36.57; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726101AbgA0Sf7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:59 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:31894 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725845AbgA0Sf7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:59 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00RIZYul139611 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:57 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xrhv0s517-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:57 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:54 -0000 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:51 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00RIZo8a43057508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:50 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068CFAE051; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ABEAE058; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.185.238]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:35:49 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot aggregate From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" Cc: Jerry Snitselaar , James Bottomley , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:35:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1580148975.5088.38.camel@linux.ibm.com> References: <1580140919-6127-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <1580148975.5088.38.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20012718-0012-0000-0000-00000381286D X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20012718-0013-0000-0000-000021BD795E Message-Id: <1580150148.5088.41.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-27_06:2020-01-24,2020-01-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001270147 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 13:16 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 17:38 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity- > > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mimi Zohar > > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:02 PM > > > To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: Jerry Snitselaar ; James Bottomley > > > ; linux- > > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mimi Zohar > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the > > > boot aggregate > > > > Hi Mimi > > > > I did a similar change (patch 8/8) in the patch set I just sent. The patch is simpler, > > as it reuses the data structures I introduced in the previous patches. Let me know > > if I can keep this part in my patch set or I should remove it. > > Only 2/2 "ima: support calculating the boot_aggregate based on > different TPM banks" is really needed to address Jerry's bug report. >  Let's review your patch set before making any decisions about 1/2 > "ima: use the IMA configured hash algo to calculate the boot > aggregate". To be more precise, we need to be able to backport the bug fix.  So the change needs to be independent of anything you're defining now.  Changes/improvements can be made on top of the bug fix. thanks, Mimi