Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3816847ybl; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:02:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhmlV/lsIQwAkknawl59xzNHxUhGuWFc/We8+1skrsheZnHHO8wUQCoRBHEShm5U1v2Ioq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c9:: with SMTP id t9mr5150346otq.177.1580151737854; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:02:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580151737; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P7CV1hp7gGPqBlu2sFs2oJNMwGoE+xBHIDEG+/z8zfCtfRI1uZvUV99o+yxEC5srkl K6Y6BQMztohi0LOVO55ZgL3TOsTh9pfDt2Vsdv/qMV0WsWhvfxBuqIfkUVfQt9LnzY82 jSjvnCLkHUJBJIgBcLyKS7D73BEnaGmEgx6oVshuZ6fym2UXQW1AfDnlEc8XdTzvGWAm YEB183wB4V5V/bz31RASj7ycW6Fm1mhNvMgNMrRvRLu9Lq6opSFoHKSWMPwj/aJjch45 64ejomskLFxPboq/NTMR66+hRvJUYZqZAdngIPLu7iNhjmR4InUrQ+4r3yH91QZbYb/4 WQ/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=AB0PKGPgk+OAWxGRQvMX+/paMO/D7dA9y2T7+EixdKE=; b=EIx5eHcx79XhfFvEPJpj2S/qi9rbY8Fyd8/fEAP0xx4uxebgKYMFQjGFaWOncA4KQb omKWNHh/qFhb91WnCvQzQQ0xz6yyM3kWgwQ74GVOOrS0dkBoA2bWzcZhmt7IkWONapdp WjKlot2r74XzlJJNoYp8aQzH5HOhSD1EVBNjKmS8dODiJNpGOoIm6zX3iuAqcz84ZR4k WpZalIf51Up/ThCOvTgfB4lrUjx4LqaL4BKzV5tPJl4xD20c7Qft8AB97ELunAvN/eza DLbaNeMk5InxPQH/sELL3x5WFU/sIbADHTVvSdr7uH3l/PMBNLhx1S+oIH581lrC7Jly AaUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o5HfwAsq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si7492717otk.80.2020.01.27.11.02.05; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o5HfwAsq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726210AbgA0TAq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:00:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:39777 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725845AbgA0TAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 14:00:45 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id e9so569203pjr.4 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:00:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AB0PKGPgk+OAWxGRQvMX+/paMO/D7dA9y2T7+EixdKE=; b=o5HfwAsqGXTSjB5v2j0w44xMU45J5gCPHpXhNHVbF77cDX0u/ojB8kcOccXNFHkIJH wETo1GSrgJv+RrfiQoug7qs2j2JUSIl8msE3H4tUvnBdu4YSLMD6eT///yfwxVam4bi0 N87IaLB9n5zpJ5vBtfm0Zhd3TV2iNvmHg8D+uAQbh1Zt/iiUTznQrwxH74Liep4wj+QB VBnzDEQRc6aBQ6eG/70zfcrgeR8cZyljTRR5shkTqaR+buB/7MrHiIGnVfL+qOsVvrP3 QGs8cbD4AN4eLC1Vlxo7EPK+cWTZxgvckIzL5czhbCTJeCaHAoGaStTy4Bw0xTduuHWU 8N5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AB0PKGPgk+OAWxGRQvMX+/paMO/D7dA9y2T7+EixdKE=; b=KrHh1wu3dUpQAiD1UeofPhwdy2A0zyM+hgwC9x/qfPRJMz+PkJt5JbBowcmOymJTqO fpSAyQZ1xwI9aGy7xPCRZVk7S32v21qNNVmUZ3lRDfb5RW8KkQ8J8hkULPs3e8Xyzuwi 0lwQHoZ+0XBXFqqYNOj38Ca0u7dIyNB6YxgnnPvdma+n7HdWmNurj7PBBuVBY4NYbthW 79sNdCIdTqJn5qB5+hwuv/ujsPhXQ25rKr6hL+F54F24EDyXGxYNqvTObF/EOtrLDMy/ kOPrsqMUZ09MGIpUqV/kks7KfhhQfUKZ6v82pw0wMvRH6vthM1NuIzUsewVci9RhCGte RiqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUYZNh6/oOzdrO/2mfFrA+xzNbJoPzjXCeV0KU7tOj63JRyAP5c /cjfSs+reiUEAVwCv+Y3fm++PWpVXb+7/9jzeuw94w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:858a:: with SMTP id m10mr54935pjn.117.1580151644562; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:00:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191211192742.95699-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20191211192742.95699-3-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20200109162303.35f4f0a3@xps13> <20200125162803.5a2375d7@xps13> In-Reply-To: <20200125162803.5a2375d7@xps13> From: Brendan Higgins Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:00:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] mtd: rawnand: add unspecified HAS_IOMEM dependency To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Jeff Dike , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Vignesh Raghavendra , Boris Brezillon , Piotr Sroka , linux-um , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Gow , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Brendan, > > Brendan Higgins wrote on Fri, 24 Jan 2020 > 18:12:12 -0800: > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:23 AM Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brendan, > > > > > > Brendan Higgins wrote on Wed, 11 Dec 2019 > > > 11:27:37 -0800: > > > > > > > Currently CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CADENCE implicitly depends on > > > > CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM=y; consequently, on architectures without IOMEM we get > > > > the following build error: > > > > > > > > ld: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.o: in function `cadence_nand_dt_probe.cold.31': > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.c:2969: undefined reference to `devm_platform_ioremap_resource' > > > > ld: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/cadence-nand-controller.c:2977: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource' > > > > > > > > Fix the build error by adding the unspecified dependency. > > > > > > > > Reported-by: Brendan Higgins > > > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins > > > > --- > > > > > > Sorry for the delay. > > > > > > Acked-by: Miquel Raynal > > > > It looks like my change has not been applied to nand/next; is this the > > branch it should be applied to? I have also verified that this patch > > isn't in linux-next as of Jan 24th. > > > > Is mtd/linux the correct tree for this? Or do I need to reach out to > > someone else? > > When I sent my Acked-by I supposed someone else would pick the patch, > but there is actually no dependency with all the other patches so I > don't know why I did it... Sorry about that. I'll take it anyway in my > PR for 5.6. No worries, thanks!