Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:23:53 +0100
From:   Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>,
        "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/11] proc: flush task dcache entries from all procfs
 instances
Message-ID: <20200127232352.s3mvvfkrta3i5h7w@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6>
Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>,
        "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20200125130541.450409-1-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
 <20200125130541.450409-8-gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wiGNSQCA8TYa1Akp0_GRpe=ELKDPkDX5nzM5R=oDy1U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiGNSQCA8TYa1Akp0_GRpe=ELKDPkDX5nzM5R=oDy1U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 10:45:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 5:06 AM Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This allows to flush dcache entries of a task on multiple procfs mounts
> > per pid namespace.
> 
> From a quick read-through, this is the only one I really react negatively to.
> 
> The locking looks odd. It only seems to protect the new proc_mounts
> list, but then it's a whole big rwsem, and it's taken over all of
> proc_flush_task_mnt(), and the locking is exported to all over as a
> result of that - including the dummy functions for "there is no proc"
> case.
> 
> And proc_flush_task_mnt() itself should need no locking over any of
> it, so it's all just for the silly looping over the list.

Thank you, I will rework this part.

> So
> 
>  (a) this looks fishy and feels wrong - I get a very strong feeling
> that the locking is wrong to begin with, and could/should have been
> done differently
> 
>  (b) all the locking should have been internal to /proc, and those
> wrappers shouldn't exist in a common header file (and certainly not
> for the non-proc case).
> 
> Yes, (a) is just a feeling, and I don't have any great suggestions.
> Maybe make it an RCU list and use a spinlock for updating it?

I’m thinking, is it possible to get rid of proc_flush_task at all ?
Maybe we can try to flush dcache during readdir for example.

> But (b) is pretty much a non-starter in this form. Those wrappers
> shouldn't be in a globally exported core header file. No way.
> 
>                Linus
> 

-- 
Rgrds, legion