Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp110784ybl; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:22:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlnLEMvxyfwJbOEKS8UHivp1pPkDo1Z+vI1Txo2CD67SKi9MG0jo1QnH2ZjYZDQbUxV8e9 X-Received: by 2002:aca:ab51:: with SMTP id u78mr1997757oie.21.1580196160196; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:22:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580196160; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jsK5Xc6k3TD5c+TNp7d7yqtm4Hx5qt+F+Uz25qBlo27WKtAEtMXrICaADz6VyCu/6h SDLcyGUbcm5+4yO1sq7MF3s9Tk5zuD0TrWsqHoClwF+ZOJV3uYXfLhq2h4AlsoiuFYiX Ue2UPWbMVVp2IcamVQal1AQToe2pRMAbHa+vOjXY6yKUtzmbRwZ59o5x6DfbCQ+iUFGH a9IKKH691aTSlEg0yqGQ1E+ydIviw5GcgTibvRvrg2lAGicHiNCtKI4T0Hee823YUEMi 15Hd3WrJ2vIgwy96Hu16bR+a5X6KyPl5MUMU9ascVTw4bldKaWiHq7qL5pQM+6B8JOm6 DHgg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=x21YpalL5LqlkKKEeVGB+luOjkPbn8cAXCEug2TWCEA=; b=AiayRMdUaUjdmRUSmu3COuL8KITX54Cx/N3UjtXQVQrT7fUMS3UxvPBV3NeAh+ZJRW XjFYJjEUOeDQPAdh5mU80hKWEgkUOLxqKqDIhCEieEH3PBE94Pg6RwzK0HoxCIMI0A6j CN6yorbBFYeTWOes7Bp/B7ujp3e3nAWuttLoGdp6naktJSI/vqC9gAqRX4h30/kHP1+H Mp5RiU7ClNkb1IMOmEPdMj3PJZ7Alvi2T3ZCo5eCqWSNXRVqDu1BITKFOf3hPHuz1J5a x4ixasmW8jy3Dq0q6ro095OWdKNEvCf9Tx3G1ctQ1B+Mkj47QiyrB83UYtLMyYMxVyYJ KfiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=deUb+Dwp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d3si4150375oia.236.2020.01.27.23.22.27; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=deUb+Dwp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726442AbgA1HUq (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:20:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com ([209.85.210.201]:47107 "EHLO mail-pf1-f201.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726149AbgA1HUX (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:20:23 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id e62so8051304pfh.14 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:20:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=x21YpalL5LqlkKKEeVGB+luOjkPbn8cAXCEug2TWCEA=; b=deUb+DwpQVonoSZCKQnNTMlQP1Lzh1009+cKfs6ixetvyNNornOu8L8iM6sZCZ1EC1 bCYKufynjbeJXB6mQT5N+rQ80MPGb6Nq5LxtLqw1EuzUInMPOHZLMLJQ323CsWtY+qRE PduOjLakiWcWsm/JYl4yujyUNYWxhK0XgnSWANlyb1HuHAZgoChlWDq7l5tRx8kO1hZP x/+VkMiuaIhKU7O6AkPyqp1FNycJUgjxozfO017LW7yTyFL7y/BKWCid/0DmbvkwswzZ YPaYbO36+IuwVWKxpgvicBc9UUtmiORlykMio3a9p3WNgoru1bsLQuNnqQw72KkQ0tZ+ pqFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=x21YpalL5LqlkKKEeVGB+luOjkPbn8cAXCEug2TWCEA=; b=p4W+UirlLx6CAkZNAcunZ6dkzFWhAHqG6EHbBy9ZGx6vpA6vprx1ehMGt0yYhzVM+2 a/XmEzK+U3+B1FNcEnIi4t6rq/6P0dIJpoPQZv82OuO0rACkPtf9hla2V2pCs3MTMZXz FbZDOUGLR2bBNlPo1cLlLuvUB6jXn3G5mPJShohO3GkfGl1sAx/5WLXSRSoLQYkoVVvm pwCqStjLLhUxt4O2Tawy/G5nkIhvWzMizV/1/hQcJUp9agrQGQyjeNpfd1TQ1b7klUHZ Pk/z7EXUrNU9Cs5LJxihYkrUZ8aZBPqAUH9H9h6oY/BKLwFXKYezm5awrafAAmHwrw7E fO9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWlsj4nat+b4S1KAL7fZFxenSjLXUfyv19XQTbEHFdPwpYnUCNH siXMqyxyTBsuYgz14BZ27YhSAT6eJdaGQMERQnnNQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5608:: with SMTP id l8mr24168134pgs.210.1580196022999; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:20:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:19:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200128072002.79250-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20200128072002.79250-4-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200128072002.79250-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog Subject: [PATCH v1 3/7] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests From: Brendan Higgins To: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com, yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, knut.omang@oracle.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Maguire Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins --- include/kunit/test.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +- lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 2dfb550c6723a..8a02f93a6b505 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -197,46 +197,63 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name); int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite); -/** - * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite - * with KUnit. - * - * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. - * - * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means - * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init - * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit - * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; - * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in - * an earlier init phase. - * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules - * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an - * array of suites for a module. - * - * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as - * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit - * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after - * everything else is definitely initialized. +/* + * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into + * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins + * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define + * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering + * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. */ -#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ - static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \ - static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ +#ifdef MODULE +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ + static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ { \ + struct kunit_suite *suites[] = (__suites); \ unsigned int i; \ + \ for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) \ kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); \ return 0; \ } \ - late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + \ static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ { \ return; \ } \ module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) +#else +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) +#endif /* MODULE */ + +#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ + kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ + static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ + __used __aligned(8) __section(.kunit_test_suites) = unique_array + +/** + * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite + * with KUnit. + * + * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. + * + * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * more information. + * + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done + * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites + * ELF section. + * + * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not + * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a + * module. + * + */ +#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ + __kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array), \ + __UNIQUE_ID(suites), \ + __VA_ARGS__) #define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile index fab55649b69a5..c282f02ca066b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o kunit-objs += test.o \ string-stream.o \ assert.o \ - try-catch.o + try-catch.o \ + executor.o obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..6429927d598a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include + +/* + * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in + * include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern. + */ +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; + +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) + +static int kunit_run_all_tests(void) +{ + struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; + bool has_test_failed = false; + + for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; + suites < __kunit_suites_end; + suites++) { + for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) { + if (kunit_run_tests(*subsuite)) + has_test_failed = true; + } + } + + if (has_test_failed) + return -EFAULT; + + return 0; +} + +late_initcall(kunit_run_all_tests); + +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -- 2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog