Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:39:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:39:40 -0400 Received: from james.kalifornia.com ([208.179.59.2]:20265 "EHLO james.kalifornia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:39:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3BCC8D0D.7020906@blue-labs.org> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:39:57 -0400 From: David Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011013 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Stevenson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Tcpdump filters, problem with UDP and 2.4.x In-Reply-To: <3BC8A04A.5090108@blue-labs.org> <048a01c1555a$09d4e790$07fea8c0@stu2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org No, it is for DNS traffic. James Stevenson wrote: >>I see a lot of "UDP: bad checksum. ..." between two of my servers. I >>haven't attached a tcpdump output of the packets because a) the packets >>between machine A and B travel through a GRE tunnel and b) does anyone >>have tcpdump filters or know how to finagle tcpdump into dumping the >>embedded packet instead of the GRE header'd packet? >> >id this for NFS udp traffic ? >if it is then you will see it i have seen this on both 2.2.x and 2.4.x >kernels >it only shows up on the nfs server side for me though. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/