Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:41:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:41:40 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:41735 "EHLO infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:41:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:35:21 +0100 (BST) From: Riley Williams X-X-Sender: To: Oliver Xymoron cc: Luigi Genoni , Henning P Schmiedehausen , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.0.39 kernel release history In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Oliver. >> ...between the 0.99.12a and 0.99.14 kernel releases. I suspect >> both that there were other kernels in each of the three gaps >> shown above, but have been unable to find any reliable >> information regarding them. Personally, I would anticipate full >> alphabets for both the 0.99.12 and 0.99.13 subseries as occurs >> with the 0.99.14 subseries, but can't prove it. > I distinctly remember running a 0.99.13j for quite a while. I > believe it was the stock kernel in an early Slackware. That confirms my guess, but unfortunately, the only remaining 0.99.13 kernels are 0.99.13 itself and 0.99.13k - I've never managed to track down any of the other members of that series. Likewise, 0.99.12 and 0.99.12a exist, then there's a big time gap to 0.99.13 with nothing in between still existing as far as I can determine. Best wishes from Riley. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/