Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945905AbWBCTSm (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:18:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945900AbWBCTSm (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:18:42 -0500 Received: from hummeroutlaws.com ([12.161.0.3]:20999 "EHLO atpro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945908AbWBCTSk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:18:40 -0500 From: "Jim Crilly" Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:18:22 -0500 To: Joerg Schilling Cc: matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cdwrite@other.debian.org, acahalan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [cdrtools PATCH (GPL)] Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <20060203191821.GD11241@voodoo> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling , matthias.andree@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cdwrite@other.debian.org, acahalan@gmail.com References: <787b0d920602020917u1e7267c5lbea5f02182e0c952@mail.gmail.com> <20060202210949.GD10352@voodoo> <43E27792.nail54V1B1B3Z@burner> <787b0d920602021827m4890fbf4j24d110dc656d2d3a@mail.gmail.com> <43E374CF.nail5CAMKAKEV@burner> <20060203182049.GB11083@merlin.emma.line.org> <43E3A19E.nail6A511N92B@burner> <20060203184240.GC11241@voodoo> <43E3AA95.nail6AV21A253@burner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43E3AA95.nail6AV21A253@burner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1970 Lines: 52 On 02/03/06 08:10:13PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > "Jim Crilly" wrote: > > > On 02/03/06 07:31:58PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Matthias Andree wrote: > > > > > > > So patches to the rescue -- please review the patch below (for 2.01.01a05). > > > > Note that GPL 2a and 2c apply, so you cannot merge a modified version of > > > > my patch without adding a tag that you goofed my fixes. > > > > > > OK, I did not look at it and I never will! > > > > > > J?rg > > > > This is an excellent example to verify how bad cdrecord developent > > is done..... > > Well, > > cdrecord is done as good as possible. The fact that you seem to sling mud at everyone that doesn't agree with you makes that seem questionable. > Note that if peope send a patch together with personal infringements or > untrue claims, the best I can do is to ignore alltogether. > > I did spend a lot of time with a fruitful discussion with Matthias. > Then Matthias started this thread.... It now seems like Matthias > does not like to be serious anymore. It's hard to have a serious discussion with you because you just keep parotting the same things and pointing fingers over and over. > I am of course interested to make cdrecord better, but for the price > of spending an ridiculously amount of time ob LKML. > > J?rg > And you never did answer my question about why cdrecord is the only app on any OS to use devicename:scsibus,target,lun to specify the target device. Every other tool out there, e.g. mount, fsck, tar, etc, all use the device name exported by the OS, e.g. /dev/c0t0s0d0, /dev/hda1, /dev/nst0, etc, so why is it necessary for cdrecord to be different? Jim. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/