Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp992797ybl; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:18:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyhh+z1AZpvPWR9Kt2Y5wdthhhwq20xzjaOgocAXSCXQFczpHdnYSNTWnelpWFMygMbNW5J X-Received: by 2002:aca:8d5:: with SMTP id 204mr630191oii.141.1580332727585; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:18:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580332727; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ucBGuaIKdGKMnLAZdLobwhMB2Q58VFJaS59tDRiRJ3c6iw8R2uM0yrQiGgga2SuWTx 8zBjqwXWOubJEF3hkvx6pMYeNXnb37YvRZeodsOKQRiLwGiMmYszB7t0KcAKzu4xrjSn xmBiwyPnnLugJYPOmes/y7i4QRNUqrvNtBvtf7Zr6Pxit4UQ7rd1SwWKEwYJWMcv9FbE dUnxX7PTtFmYk5acMLu+mLvSNLBW0C5kwTF4WAF6zDAfVn28PoXMIw+m1gYpuLciCHi+ CjRvnzh0nf32qcpBWpuJSZF/Uzz0CpJ6+s6s/l2xU3MBiGDJGR5JWKlzNDSAvYf0eow3 9KNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=NyxwaSY58IflKjPEEx4jSwznzdLHDAImwvs6Cu+xyN0=; b=hHnMEsJaW+Tyy2UMozz468xgmBJnUqFjRoSw0uH7kuwGiLJrNOfNPfULtFuKVt1W69 gryDEVzBTNf4//CEahS7jkkqmBUvnoYSN9nRXgMIhX8G+pKIUHSMb9NKiXYd/8GaGnzz hDJE3xvD3qqYSTd0WPW4qG79eF7eFfFb0nCdU2lxHpAwRbyn1h1ynNnWqctkYCCCJnmx ezeWAboKOdoaUA3H2uvja3gc0vqihiNpIQO5bFbhUcJynOvPChMQy6f2U698s+TSmA4b 9MDRNGMUrcrjk/MVaCdBpPUyF45cSBbINA+kWtAQcu1qNRvy+e3oArp5kFGTsLhHncUQ U6cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10si1555686oic.153.2020.01.29.13.18.35; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:18:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727357AbgA2VBJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:01:09 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51920 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727208AbgA2VBI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:01:08 -0500 Received: from 51.26-246-81.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be ([81.246.26.51] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iwuSO-0006I8-S8; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:01:05 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02740105CFD; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:00:58 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Evan Green Cc: Rajat Jain , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci , Linux Kernel Mailing List , x86@kernel.org, Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Avoid torn updates to MSI pairs In-Reply-To: References: <20200117162444.v2.1.I9c7e72144ef639cc135ea33ef332852a6b33730f@changeid> <87y2tytv5i.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87eevqkpgn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87d0b82a9o.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <878slwmpu9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87imkv63yf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87pnf342pr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:00:58 +0100 Message-ID: <877e1a2d11.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Evan, Evan Green writes: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:48 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Bah. I'm sure I looked at that call chain, noticed the double vector >> lock and then forgot. Delta patch below. > > It's working well with the delta patch, been running for about an hour > with no issues. thanks for the info and for testing! Could you please add some instrumentation to see how often this stuff actually triggers spurious interrupts? Thanks, tglx