Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1102160ybl; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:26:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7JI3sQdibvHWSNjTMBeQsQf+eLfcQB627A7d6QpAmIhHQzZsMQBcqBid9ke6PVW0ImDEi X-Received: by 2002:aca:7244:: with SMTP id p65mr975392oic.50.1580340386591; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:26:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580340386; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CLK3qYz2i84SHmEzlUazrZ7KGaBAJorMQJjtd1TxZd7hp71Ixx0uXIgGyVN4LGnBuE 9pyprTx2K/XrCfU4Y3vfjED7FP0qmic6d3FRlJcGvAfObseHrNc7W0yS1GVOKLlQCwm8 sqg6pYc+1Y4UNiavfwRel2BYTU4icF+HgKvhWHkBA312Rp91gi4t6z1dB3/sHcwa04d8 3krMjM9PKpLd3f0jvjn/CvyuFfCSF5CXbSoBDr8Q/gZc0c0RtYsqnkJtNhZp9licynDi 8N5gruE7xet7j5CUB2EnvgVMTuJU+z94g8OifKOunSMBgRMu/ou9mAvnZiBAmI20PS5j MHVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=5899mwuqENX6lCLwrkX+/AuwqmIviaBAWbid34IwXc0=; b=q3ZP3RAGKbJNrpjc0i2ScAluDv6ih20cZWXdXfsDKGHJee544q/nrFXgeuA39AA4Qx oDEOvwgs0RoPHO9nb0uO/5PlWDx5PFM8pNqTHwPl4gW3VjuTSp61p10AbcRYqJ7AFcpR Bu501Ru32MeAi38Qk2wXCwpgsLHEiMzSnyZlpD291ySqziy303mwM1aD8BerdMZ0sukA MtEvCBtRC5HtLUmBlBSb5pH3i1baZ28LFT2ZumxD4bkG4oiXO9Hud61PqQIMdqRLdlGe Qg0zeVU+vCAsLxopdw5ZfzpZxfnsLynBDP1W/VkyXOCJUm9QJ81jJqgI3hEhwn/oWTxu +dBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=YEzfqnDm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v67si1885031oia.26.2020.01.29.15.26.13; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=YEzfqnDm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726768AbgA2XZX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:25:23 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:47148 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726401AbgA2XZW (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:25:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5899mwuqENX6lCLwrkX+/AuwqmIviaBAWbid34IwXc0=; b=YEzfqnDmurAxrqvqRBTgtAWzg QCmCH4wzo4/pPD/622md4gyEDABLCj7X54aFEM48vK38dMRUDs+z5jQoLxjm9B6zQS58r08Qzp7Vm 6iKuwW6/YgUSR4HTgXyVThTpM1T2ejQkZrMy+rPyfnnTZjKXZ+k1MOcTIsJOAVlPJqLhUjECvETa5 qDHuK/m5ajntlS5NciokDKpgb8uSGLjLgMcXWeG4wb6o7WlPdlGTVWAx6tl/m1s4SeqLNctc+iFI9 Pm4PyR01pSE7b6LfsYF1Yk66efPPJE4KDuvO2oXEtZNjG2UueszhGXK99Sw4Cf1FWER+9JEi7zg5z 13sf+HWWw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:40926) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwha-0007v7-O8; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:24:57 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwhN-0003n9-7a; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:24:41 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:24:41 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Wei Yang Cc: Dmitry Osipenko , akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, kirill@shutemov.name, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, thellstrom@vmware.com, Thierry Reding , Jon Hunter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/mremap: use pmd_addr_end to calculate next in move_page_tables() Message-ID: <20200129232441.GI25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200117232254.2792-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20200117232254.2792-4-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <7147774a-14e9-4ff3-1548-4565f0d214d5@gmail.com> <20200129094738.GE25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200129215745.GA20736@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200129215745.GA20736@richard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 05:57:45AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:47:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 05:47:57PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> 18.01.2020 02:22, Wei Yang пишет: > >> > Use the general helper instead of do it by hand. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang > >> > --- > >> > mm/mremap.c | 7 ++----- > >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c > >> > index c2af8ba4ba43..a258914f3ee1 100644 > >> > --- a/mm/mremap.c > >> > +++ b/mm/mremap.c > >> > @@ -253,11 +253,8 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > >> > > >> > for (; old_addr < old_end; old_addr += extent, new_addr += extent) { > >> > cond_resched(); > >> > - next = (old_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK; > >> > - /* even if next overflowed, extent below will be ok */ > >> > + next = pmd_addr_end(old_addr, old_end); > >> > extent = next - old_addr; > >> > - if (extent > old_end - old_addr) > >> > - extent = old_end - old_addr; > >> > old_pmd = get_old_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_addr); > >> > if (!old_pmd) > >> > continue; > >> > @@ -301,7 +298,7 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > >> > > >> > if (pte_alloc(new_vma->vm_mm, new_pmd)) > >> > break; > >> > - next = (new_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK; > >> > + next = pmd_addr_end(new_addr, new_addr + len); > >> > if (extent > next - new_addr) > >> > extent = next - new_addr; > >> > move_ptes(vma, old_pmd, old_addr, old_addr + extent, new_vma, > >> > > >> > >> Hello Wei, > >> > >> Starting with next-20200122, I'm seeing the following in KMSG on NVIDIA > >> Tegra (ARM32): > >> > >> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:(ptrval) type:MM_ANONPAGES val:190 > >> > >> and eventually kernel hangs. > >> > >> Git's bisection points to this patch and reverting it helps. Please fix, > >> thanks in advance. > > > >The above is definitely wrong - pXX_addr_end() are designed to be used > >with an address index within the pXX table table and the address index > >of either the last entry in the same pXX table or the beginning of the > >_next_ pXX table. Arbitary end address indicies are not allowed. > > > > #define pmd_addr_end(addr, end) \ > ({ unsigned long __boundary = ((addr) + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK; \ > (__boundary - 1 < (end) - 1)? __boundary: (end); \ > }) > > If my understanding is correct, the definition here align the addr to next PMD > boundary or end. > > I don't see the possibility to across another PMD. Do I miss something? Look at the definition of p*_addr_end() that are used when page tables are rolled up. > >When page tables are "rolled up" when levels don't exist, it is common > >practice for these macros to just return their end address index. > >Hence, if they are used with arbitary end address indicies, then the > >iteration will fail. > > > >The only way to do this is: > > > > next = pmd_addr_end(old_addr, > > pud_addr_end(old_addr, > > p4d_addr_end(old_addr, > > pgd_addr_end(old_addr, old_end)))); > > > >which gives pmd_addr_end() (and each of the intermediate pXX_addr_end()) > >the correct end argument. However, that's a more complex and verbose, > >and likely less efficient than the current code. > > > >I'd suggest that there's nothing to "fix" in the v5.5 code wrt this, > >and trying to "clean it up" will just result in less efficient or > >broken code. > > > >-- > >RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > >FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > >According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up > > -- > Wei Yang > Help you, Help me > -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up