Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1107459ybl; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:32:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPJbaryX6fdBRMTt0GVwe2IZ+RVGxj6Un9kH2CnYOdeUQ+2TTB/wxwLC3tVC4+ZQsBWKcY X-Received: by 2002:a54:4f8d:: with SMTP id g13mr991812oiy.43.1580340768414; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:32:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580340768; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0SvmqWHhF6TYOc/grs4dHwRDW4pGlLxqP12wsFlAM6+H2xqEHnTjDEVLulsrT1pcr2 Djs+wvI0PILA1Q2ifvjjsEiBJ9D9jGGUnIZ0qCxQB9DLhy4JzeM4DqA3Uvqmd/3YIw1v VLL3ks6Iz8JFi/LZ8+UoiGz6s7t9EZMyfYVxigH4yGHMdusMNK1BkLTYKcZAX/PTZsWd JvmD3lnYCq35dN6Bmm/SKd6iOFF5tmXXQtAW3NE81dZ3w4sidQFOrDrZVuUASA1chhXi AjxApv28hKpKIGdo+baeT9Iv+KybUjshiyBKIEy2BuKQYNCbQInbiCU/CH605FTrJjSc /8jw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=i7N+u7jIEmW2dEm6HMr/PJpc28EuZkXAo6+795EdEII=; b=MHbmgKi8MbkH26P5Be47F5xGb5LyxcUQotxQlr7sM+gVeZfnc1N6TxRvowHch8CbK1 L6WSriBy1C5wx9Yev7GizV53sGGycoht08ySRsIk6Dhi9GdaQD1kljEsM8mqwoKt4mpR AVYR4/BGuzzzOLNFx+pZGZb40ZMB4nNQ88kVc13E+s+gmLMjM391Zc+iO2gKIKiRA8xF 7gbYpElnj48YnXbVyHaLegocC96Nd68HN1Mv5MnI+uYncQG0o+A8lRGlNAn680xMIJJZ WzHeU1uzi2fQjyowwQTw4QGYTdU0v+oNtPb29/2X2n+kLEyzZ2PoSxuS3FfA/TxqNflp 5HYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=BcPiQZ5S; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y9si1800271oiy.81.2020.01.29.15.32.34; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=BcPiQZ5S; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727196AbgA2Xbh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:31:37 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f65.google.com ([209.85.161.65]:44781 "EHLO mail-yw1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727166AbgA2Xbg (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:31:36 -0500 Received: by mail-yw1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t141so942229ywc.11 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:31:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i7N+u7jIEmW2dEm6HMr/PJpc28EuZkXAo6+795EdEII=; b=BcPiQZ5SuJEvE1fQj57PZ+wzmmd808hNTnOOB4AlJVy5FOFhfMhZ+eYc5VslB0c9p7 HWIZA9A3sPKouTjZOwZA0VIgpcHe4dXyeW66GQcjrOoysN1VklosEVlDkDgnXaTfNQWR tV1nUX1/Ny+DJaWid/uedWBQVBp/0+6z+ajuc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i7N+u7jIEmW2dEm6HMr/PJpc28EuZkXAo6+795EdEII=; b=lMpWbOrvEeFVgFRyxGlBL8BG33IAsbr7tX0JE9syFsYfIQqVVWQzDA35zjfuypo9+m HtwoqHD6hXppYjq9LyQx4rAzuQLVav4opFyX62Sl1l0hP6X/l4bFq3FJzrkbyPeMp81Z T+klEFNWnayDllLDmoW2g9rcBJo6eQQ1ZNKpEoEoeuZ1jA3LXLNVtnQ8d81TwEh8SgAG 2LOG0rfn2ipvf0tXP8Jntmj2FX1HdWZ0YcW0l00McMqVeDEI5MWDpwMcTv5q2IDLUp+A 1oz+qowSvUfR6n1vzyyLuOao43QMRkOy3Lp/RRg11tbJUz7/VSV+HZzvJiJ8OI9dBTuY ZgrA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/60gZCgSUuLublEIY7GRI4ikMFkWMrfO42NUTDCVg6LkjeJom NexvFaK+av+xAc6KdqXotLdEiF3LdBs= X-Received: by 2002:a81:7cd7:: with SMTP id x206mr1131535ywc.466.1580340695207; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw1-f42.google.com (mail-yw1-f42.google.com. [209.85.161.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j11sm1675450ywg.37.2020.01.29.15.31.35 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-f42.google.com with SMTP id b186so982890ywc.1 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:31:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:ab0:30c2:: with SMTP id c2mr955764uam.8.1580340388829; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:26:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200129132313.1.I4452dc951d7556ede422835268742b25a18b356b@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Doug Anderson Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:26:16 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clk: qcom: Fix self-validation, split, and clean cruft To: Rob Herring Cc: Stephen Boyd , Taniya Das , Jeffrey Hugo , Abhishek Sahu , sivaprak@codeaurora.org, anusharao@codeaurora.org, Sricharan , Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-arm-msm , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Gross , Mark Rutland , linux-clk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:01 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:23 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > The 'qcom,gcc.yaml' file failed self-validation (dt_binding_check) > > because it required a property to be either (3 entries big), > > (3 entries big), or (7 entries big), but not more than one of those > > things. That didn't make a ton of sense. > > > > This patch splits all of the exceptional device trees (AKA those that > > would have needed if/then/else rules) from qcom,gcc.yaml. It also > > cleans up some cruft found while doing that. > > > > After this lands, this worked for me atop clk-next: > > for f in \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq8074.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8996.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8998.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qcs404.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sc7180.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8150.yaml \ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml; do \ > > ARCH=arm64 make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=$f; \ > > ARCH=arm64 make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=$f; \ > > done > > Note that using DT_SCHEMA_FILES may hide some errors in examples as > all other schemas (including the core ones) are not used for > validation. So just 'make dt_binding_check' needs to pass (ignoring > any other unrelated errors as it breaks frequently). Supposedly a > patch is coming explaining this in the documentation. That seems like it's going to be a huge pain going forward, but OK. I kept running "dtbs_check" with the DT_SCHEMA_FILES since I guess this was OK? Then I ran this atop next-20200129: # Delete broken yaml: rm Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/intel-gw-pcie.yaml ARCH=arm64 make dt_binding_check | grep 'clock/qcom' ...and that seemed OK to me. I've updated the commit message to include what I did. Hopefully it's right. > > + nvmem-cell-names: > > + minItems: 1 > > + maxItems: 2 > > + description: > > + Names for each nvmem-cells specified. > > Isn't that every instance? So drop. Dropped the description here. > Otherwise, assuming it all works: > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring Thanks. v2 now with your feedback and Jeffrey's at: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20200129152458.v2.1.I4452dc951d7556ede422835268742b25a18b356b@changeid