Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200117162444.v2.1.I9c7e72144ef639cc135ea33ef332852a6b33730f@changeid>
 <CACK8Z6Ft95qj4e_fsA32r_bcz2SsHOW1xxqZJt3_DBAJw=NMGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE=gft6fKQWExW-=xjZGzXs30XohfpA5SKggvL2WtYXAHmzMew@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y2tytv5i.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87eevqkpgn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAE=gft6YiM5S1A7iJYJTd5zmaAa8=nhLE3B94JtWa+XW-qVSqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE=gft5xta4XCJtctWe=R3w=kVr598JCbk9VSRue04nzKAk3CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE=gft7MqQ3Mej5oCT=gw6ZLMSTHoSyMGOFz=-hae-eRZvXLxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d0b82a9o.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAE=gft7C5HTmcTLsXqXbCtcYDeKG6bCJ0gmgwVNc0PDHLJ5y_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <878slwmpu9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87imkv63yf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAE=gft7Gu0ah4qcbsEB1X+kUMagCzPR+cdCfn2caofcGV+tBjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87pnf342pr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAE=gft69hQcbmT46b1T8eLdPFyb9Pp-sDYd5JfPsZ2JWL4PXqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <877e1a2d11.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CAE=gft7mLAU3G+f8gi_etRSpUijoCh7_6ni9Ob2JqjW7Q1n3yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <874kwd3lbn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <874kwd3lbn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
From:   Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:48:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAE=gft52iBTJyyvDTXeHdEYnpSSROvrQsweuXjd6OuaLO47ACw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Avoid torn updates to MSI pairs
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        x86@kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:16 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Evan,
>
> Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:01 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please add some instrumentation to see how often this stuff
> >> actually triggers spurious interrupts?
> >
> > In about 10 minutes of this script running, I got 142 hits. My script
> > can toggle the HT cpus on and off about twice per second.
> > Here's my diff (sorry it's mangled by gmail). If you're looking for
> > something else, let me know, or I can run a patch.
> >
> No, that's good data. Your testing is hiting the critical path and as
> you did not complain about negative side effects it seems to hold up to
> the expectations. I'm going to convert this to real patch with a
> proper changelog tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for your help!

Sounds good, please CC me on it and I'll be sure to test the final
result as well.
-Evan