Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: pata_arasan_cf: Use dma_request_chan() instead
 dma_request_slave_channel()
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, vireshk@kernel.org,
        b.zolnierkie@samsung.com
Cc:     vkoul@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200113142747.15240-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <6bd30916-0c35-b1c1-d08f-b7dd9e181dba@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 21:10:21 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200113142747.15240-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/13/20 7:27 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
> eating up the error code.
> 
> The dma_request_chan() is the standard API to request slave channel,
> clients should be moved away from the legacy API to allow us to retire
> them.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe