Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945936AbWBCUJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:09:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945938AbWBCUJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:09:40 -0500 Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de ([193.174.154.14]:22450 "EHLO mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945936AbWBCUJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:09:40 -0500 From: Joerg Schilling Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:08:36 +0100 To: schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, matthias.andree@gmx.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cdwrite@other.debian.org, acahalan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [cdrtools PATCH (GPL)] Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <43E3B844.nail6C2111521@burner> References: <43E1EA35.nail4R02QCGIW@burner> <20060202161853.GB8833@voodoo> <787b0d920602020917u1e7267c5lbea5f02182e0c952@mail.gmail.com> <20060202210949.GD10352@voodoo> <43E27792.nail54V1B1B3Z@burner> <787b0d920602021827m4890fbf4j24d110dc656d2d3a@mail.gmail.com> <43E374CF.nail5CAMKAKEV@burner> <20060203182049.GB11083@merlin.emma.line.org> <43E3A19E.nail6A511N92B@burner> <20060203191415.GA18533@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060203191415.GA18533@merlin.emma.line.org> User-Agent: nail 11.2 8/15/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1631 Lines: 40 Matthias Andree wrote: > Joerg Schilling schrieb am 2006-02-03: > > > Matthias Andree wrote: > > > > > So patches to the rescue -- please review the patch below (for 2.01.01a05). > > > Note that GPL 2a and 2c apply, so you cannot merge a modified version of > > > my patch without adding a tag that you goofed my fixes. > > > > OK, I did not look at it and I never will! > > Perhaps you should -- the patch impairs your changes to get > needless device enumeration changes into the kernel... Well, the problem with your last mail is that it is full of idioligy. I am of course willing to discuss useful ideas, but believe me that you will have no luck if you leave a technical based discussion. > I'll amend the license: Show me your integrated patch. If it works > properly on my computer and without false warnings, you add a note to > the changelog and the AN-2.01.01a06 file, I will demote the patch's > license to the MIT license as in See: http://bundesrecht.juris.de/urhg/ I hope this helps you to understand things better.J?rg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/