Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945942AbWBCUUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:20:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945944AbWBCUUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:20:14 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:10674 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945942AbWBCUUM (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:20:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:19:45 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kirill Korotaev , Kirill Korotaev , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , frankeh@watson.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, serue@us.ibm.com, arjan@infradead.org, Rik van Riel , Alexey Kuznetsov , Andrey Savochkin , devel@openvz.org, Pavel Emelianov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup Message-ID: <20060203201945.GA18224@kroah.com> References: <43E38BD1.4070707@openvz.org> <43E3915A.2080000@sw.ru> <1138991641.6189.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1138991641.6189.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 706 Lines: 19 On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:34:01AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > Lastly, is this a place for krefs? I don't see a real need for a > destructor yet, but the idea is fresh in my mind. Well, what happens when you drop the last reference to this container? Right now, your patch doesn't cause anything to happen, and if that's acceptable, then fine, you don't need to use a struct kref. But if not, then why have a reference count at all? :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/