Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2305897ybl; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:10:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTEXz+mvf5QXQd6satJTrcTH565MoNo5a6GoD9SCgEyjPFIOWPhEe3cJnC4ojYlKAPCU6Y X-Received: by 2002:aca:aa0a:: with SMTP id t10mr4401445oie.156.1580425817845; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:10:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580425817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l4BGbpjEAVYIpiHkSpDz0AhbErvHdDTqC6rEU00eKt5OKVg5FuxL6QgA+dl/UOEaED 8ZKFpeUNMQAN+P7U26wWbzXa7biiPwNZn+4GmcALYD4XGfUBlDsxw5tT8ucEUSuZJo/F YB97d9dwCbGFH9dAnVrJqhirQTsvPTmBsEI+k8fPliJIlZD2WXzQQXkZ6vv63h7+4gU1 Sn42TXc1ZxnzJ37pEa/h/XFh2ULq4p+vgUlxQ4nIAwMfgmGj/49vMrXJ9cn4bcoyp2sB F1mz6SF57EJTbkhLmRncJ3shKmbodJIWeRVPtpSdRhPaR+LyLkVZxwBXjL8KloP1Dvyl kOYw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=IbDRg6zbsgqc2BEk8PubWRl+PT/RvXbB4sFt6LMz7H0=; b=xFeN+j/GReCbh8K/ZLVdYWm4oUQ52iSeaVfKCxHM2ZYoQzEFnJwKDiMMV53JGqU2qi 9D0lZaK1YXsLqvJR2ltajFEj0fDMPmnLqUik9c6NEjlWqgA0M4iOuTsZyJEfwBDucTz/ r0NOJsoghVJYEBn5hISVAxOdQe+Txnr7lTX7mOXfouAzNhTL8qYW/6tq2OoFsjgrmSST rqVDiJ2lOmVBxa2d5221m5sYHz5LnXDYlQRCd7tGqZxD93beSsDUqVM+WRP56Pmf9mOZ EKhAn8x6mz1ZG9zUpGRhXkjp1B44QrsvLL0Ze6wpHJd/asH2xBCuSj4xYEg4+ox5BE9o vTIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tGK07UCQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10si3122905ois.76.2020.01.30.15.10.05; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tGK07UCQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727729AbgA3XIk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:08:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com ([209.85.214.201]:51188 "EHLO mail-pl1-f201.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727664AbgA3XIh (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:08:37 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id g5so2599261plq.17 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:08:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=IbDRg6zbsgqc2BEk8PubWRl+PT/RvXbB4sFt6LMz7H0=; b=tGK07UCQYvj9yBuFCz++BIeHcHMWwTlajiYS79eMiJcVAxknMIcATy7OBQfzA85Fhy 515PkQZsE6McWZYwRl3wbEg6LtwSwrVb1ejyZTSFspI2+3j37xq+iNypzlchhGUCoYDE jRKxHrZ547i7LLO9tevpjPKeCuB3M2X0eeuyo8c/ZAep8JSJt06NRKGBrg063dwI3rPh 9PlD22vT/b8BNTJhrFySAvX4FQw2kgTikkog0Kryd/X2tHyhR4eUo5my1Tso4J58XIMM Gq2NikLDSBIRK8v8KtqjQqNPpaoyQBpPl9TsTrEsuGnFSB1Rin2YzEnzdXnCycBJv2NB Zl3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=IbDRg6zbsgqc2BEk8PubWRl+PT/RvXbB4sFt6LMz7H0=; b=cp3AULIFu22EBgcpVIYG43AmI7hWZotu67Sn3SFiwq8TxjuNVGQt3qN6dzRxj6EKGx 5QlSXgUaQL9TKnICXNQ+JJhHi1b/BGc+tW6Ro5IFMkZgJkDxgUuexkLycYGHo2d9bEAN BX/vmt1AJzURt2dw9F3k/rYX7a3CwCv1mIrRpNvH2t9z3tLkuiwz/9rCvPlIhXoI8IKO vjcRJ9Bt6Qk100v98uAF57s6/SfFcaGdWMCQMkT4BS9V6UZQkOWC820PZcgDs3VwEM+a 5eXhuZdrCXmnTa6nRRNi90Z9x/nO8LN5Cv+qDu0C8ZTnMYGMLKIAqfNQZL7wcSc2O3t7 feTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU32WQrPTGz8j45DPfuRkGy2EvqI1g0uhC61LqXvrASLHFk1qZh OjRO5KMD4HRE3Xo/GxdxhkERQ6mBB1up9zLySGb+5g== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d1d:: with SMTP id d29mr6674884pgd.387.1580425716847; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:08:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:08:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200130230812.142642-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Message-Id: <20200130230812.142642-4-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200130230812.142642-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests From: Brendan Higgins To: jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com, yzaikin@google.com, davidgow@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sboyd@kernel.org, logang@deltatee.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, knut.omang@oracle.com, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Maguire Add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire Co-developed-by: Iurii Zaikin Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin Co-developed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd --- include/kunit/test.h | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +- lib/kunit/executor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/executor.c diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 2dfb550c6723a..8a02f93a6b505 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -197,46 +197,63 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name); int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite); -/** - * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite - * with KUnit. - * - * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. - * - * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means - * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init - * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit - * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; - * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in - * an earlier init phase. - * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules - * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an - * array of suites for a module. - * - * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as - * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit - * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after - * everything else is definitely initialized. +/* + * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into + * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins + * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define + * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering + * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. */ -#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ - static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \ - static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ +#ifdef MODULE +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ + static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ { \ + struct kunit_suite *suites[] = (__suites); \ unsigned int i; \ + \ for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) \ kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); \ return 0; \ } \ - late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + \ static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ { \ return; \ } \ module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) +#else +#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) +#endif /* MODULE */ + +#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ + kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ + static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ + __used __aligned(8) __section(.kunit_test_suites) = unique_array + +/** + * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite + * with KUnit. + * + * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. + * + * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * more information. + * + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done + * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites + * ELF section. + * + * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not + * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a + * module. + * + */ +#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ + __kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array), \ + __UNIQUE_ID(suites), \ + __VA_ARGS__) #define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile index fab55649b69a5..c282f02ca066b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Makefile +++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o kunit-objs += test.o \ string-stream.o \ assert.o \ - try-catch.o + try-catch.o \ + executor.o obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..6429927d598a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include + +/* + * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in + * include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern. + */ +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; + +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) + +static int kunit_run_all_tests(void) +{ + struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; + bool has_test_failed = false; + + for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; + suites < __kunit_suites_end; + suites++) { + for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) { + if (kunit_run_tests(*subsuite)) + has_test_failed = true; + } + } + + if (has_test_failed) + return -EFAULT; + + return 0; +} + +late_initcall(kunit_run_all_tests); + +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -- 2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog