Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mingo@kernel.org,
        will@kernel.org
Cc:     oleg@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, williams@redhat.com,
        bristot@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.com
References: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
From:   Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <b4cfb580-e7ed-d441-f615-e6056a9d2d75@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:23:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/31/20 10:07 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
>
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
>
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
>
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?
>
>
The patchset looks good to me.

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Cheers,
Longman