Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1037494ybl; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwc7KGblLmUATU9xiHomWG5ekTN2TDfs//sKMQnwyjPzQYoa2w/FqEGqfo3TCh5DFwywSpl X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4706:: with SMTP id a6mr8455402otf.331.1580503730257; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580503730; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CwLcwE4Qw+mIe3RRJZocDNib9avqgT/G27UAafQ0On6fcxC29QymHe7NR4CTZCCnhG o67Nh4uQV0LcVqCHZ0brlE6pDNQujqG0xPD0KWexNPxuhXe28UkkAPPZ0deyFbZcfs1e B7Vz2Ot1a54w8/gXyIp0XFrReH75280oXUh6iObX31zX9bjF6TxtlsDzqvIkKXJlJbaZ a7yJQWjPq4kFpLHvVb8Y4frtogCZbqTeWZWPjzcuTLiPtEMWkE35Ub3hv8hGlGI8lfBm LBadv9zLdAjpcmP2LPFFVGHqMoat99OSq5MVeJIQ2iBAsEMGnl72GJpROsMgb+oVcflE S0Vg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Bj2ZVdi5m8QirLWwxhffHLytQbJTKfdO4kyxz2jdaYI=; b=scFeNPNCZKBedwqfo4AhITKJutZXIHbRbdz72fGKBXSi5+b9g2OKEvvmFLpD0CxIbt OzYnkrZqY6jtsezgPiNqOKWuIngw+AMpesu3smFdeN3M5bD4RPYB/z9QoIYVMUfR7mOX MEyMukt2oICITSAgmkZnmADhiyKFFcvxMv9AHRmqr1B9hPh5S1R915AZ+FHBzPk5w49+ FgYChLDQ21Od79/PuAWycxdy3uxCpO5WihEnbVQoiwFgCUT4rJDkmYdW5MMmES+aO61I TCAhDtd/D09IaiUJSNg/bNZrYlPdVf1tIVf3XBEWaf88DIO68By2MO67woTcE3It2PTA ONSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=CQxcYfCQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i13si5112311otc.228.2020.01.31.12.48.36; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=CQxcYfCQ; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726199AbgAaUqe (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:46:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41098 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726102AbgAaUqe (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:46:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (mobile-166-175-186-165.mycingular.net [166.175.186.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E7E020CC7; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 20:46:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580503592; bh=OAbeeyR3s//VEAsQUsafniXRRU4gcVxxNMvcgvT5us8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=CQxcYfCQAsZMoiyxtGAVGZ4aoEigWoo+1WUnd9goZKv23xmiicuncO7lgEY1W4BCG 5ky5mudv27MmFS3S7bGhleJ9L9FfMIFJ9W2LBE7k4XdF67h8etShzpknzjn1XkTu4G SSwDVJJ28GpK4xh2VVYfTNGKdCrRJ+Gf00YkrU6Y= Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:46:30 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Muni Sekhar Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pcie: xilinx: kernel hang - ISR readl() Message-ID: <20200131204630.GA90018@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:04:05PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:30 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:37:48PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:05 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:47:51AM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:45 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:45:13PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have module with Xilinx FPGA. It implements UART(s), SPI(s), > > > > > > > parallel I/O and interfaces them to the Host CPU via PCI Express bus. > > > > > > > I see that my system freezes without capturing the crash dump for > > > > > > > certain tests. I debugged this issue and it was tracked down to the > > > > > > > below mentioned interrupt handler code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In ISR, first reads the Interrupt Status register using ‘readl()’ as > > > > > > > given below. > > > > > > > status = readl(ctrl->reg + INT_STATUS); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And then clears the pending interrupts using ‘writel()’ as given blow. > > > > > > > writel(status, ctrl->reg + INT_STATUS); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed a kernel hang if INT_STATUS register read again after > > > > > > > clearing the pending interrupts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone clarify me why the kernel hangs without crash dump incase > > > > > > > if I read the INT_STATUS register using readl() after clearing the > > > > > > > pending bits? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can readl() block? > > > > > > > > > > > > readl() should not block in software. Obviously at the hardware CPU > > > > > > instruction level, the read instruction has to wait for the result of > > > > > > the read. Since that data is provided by the device, i.e., your FPGA, > > > > > > it's possible there's a problem there. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much for your reply. > > > > > Where can I find the details about what is protocol for reading the > > > > > ‘memory mapped IO’? Can you point me to any useful links.. > > > > > I tried locate the exact point of the kernel code where CPU waits for > > > > > read instruction as given below. > > > > > readl() -> __raw_readl() -> return *(const volatile u32 __force *)add > > > > > Do I need to check for the assembly instructions, here? > > > > > > > > The C pointer dereference, e.g., "*address", will be some sort of a > > > > "load" instruction in assembly. The CPU wait isn't explicit; it's > > > > just that when you load a value, the CPU waits for the value. > > > > > > > > > > Can you tell whether the FPGA has received the Memory Read for > > > > > > INT_STATUS and sent the completion? > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way to know this with the help of software debugging(either > > > > > enabling dynamic debugging or adding new debug prints)? Can you please > > > > > point some tools\hw needed to find this? > > > > > > > > You could learn this either via a PCIe analyzer (expensive piece of > > > > hardware) or possibly some logic in the FPGA that would log PCIe > > > > transactions in a buffer and make them accessible via some other > > > > interface (you mentioned it had parallel and other interfaces). > > > > > > > > > > On the architectures I'm familiar with, if a device doesn't respond, > > > > > > something would eventually time out so the CPU doesn't wait forever. > > > > > > > > > > What is timeout here? I mean how long CPU waits for completion? Since > > > > > this code runs from interrupt context, does it causes the system to > > > > > freeze if timeout is more? > > > > > > > > The Root Port should have a Completion Timeout. This is required by > > > > the PCIe spec. The *reporting* of the timeout is somewhat > > > > implementation-specific since the reporting is outside the PCIe > > > > domain. I don't know the duration of the timeout, but it certainly > > > > shouldn't be long enough to look like a "system freeze". > > > Does kernel writes to PCIe configuration space register ‘Device > > > Control 2 Register’ (Offset 0x28)? When I tried to read this register, > > > I noticed bit 4 is set (which disables completion timeouts) and rest > > > all other bits are zero. So, Completion Timeout detection mechanism is > > > disabled, right? If so what could be the reason for this? > > > > To my knowledge Linux doesn't set PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS > > except for one powerpc case. You can check yourself by using cscope > > or grep to look for PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS or PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2. > > > > If you're seeing bit 4 (PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS) set, it's > > likely because firmware set it. You can try booting with > > "pci=earlydump" to see what's there before Linux starts changing > > things. > > [ 0.000000] pci 0000:01:00.0 config space: > > 00: 56 15 55 55 07 00 10 00 00 00 00 05 10 00 00 00 > 10: 00 00 40 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 > 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 00 00 > 40: 01 48 03 00 08 00 00 00 05 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 60: 10 00 02 00 c2 8f 00 00 00 28 01 00 21 f4 03 00 > 70: 01 00 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 80: 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 90: 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > > Device Control 2" is located @offset 0x28 in PCI Express Capability > Structure. But where does 'PCI Express Capability Structure' located > in the above mentioned 'PCI Express Configuration Space'? "lspci -v" tells you the location of the capability. For example, on my system: # lspci -vxxxs1c.0 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port (rev f1) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 122 Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: None Memory behind bridge: f1100000-f11fffff [size=1M] Prefetchable memory behind bridge: None Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00 Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Lenovo Sunrise Point-LP PCI Express Root Port Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [140] Access Control Services Capabilities: [200] L1 PM Substates Capabilities: [220] Secondary PCI Express LnkCtl3: LnkEquIntrruptEn-, PerformEqu- LaneErrStat: 0 Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00: 86 80 10 9d 07 04 10 00 f1 00 04 06 00 00 81 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 02 00 f0 00 00 20 20: 10 f1 10 f1 f1 ff 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 01 02 00 40: 10 80 42 01 01 80 00 00 20 00 10 00 13 48 72 01 50: 42 00 12 70 00 b2 04 00 00 00 48 01 00 00 00 00 60: 00 00 00 00 37 08 00 00 00 04 00 00 0e 00 00 00 70: 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80: 05 90 01 00 18 02 e0 fe 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 90: 0d a0 00 00 aa 17 38 22 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0: 01 00 03 c8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d0: 11 10 00 07 42 18 00 00 08 00 9e 8b 00 00 00 00 e0: 00 f7 73 00 03 90 00 00 16 80 12 00 00 00 00 00 f0: 50 01 00 00 00 03 00 40 b3 0f 30 08 04 00 00 01 The PCI Express capability is at "[40]" (0x40) and PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 is a 16-bit register at offset 40 (0x28) from that. So on my system, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 is at 0x68 with value 0x0400 (PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN). This matches what lspci decodes: # lspci -vvs1c.0 | grep -A1 DevCtl2 DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR+, OBFF Disabled ARIFwd- AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn- EgressBlck-