Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1879359ybl; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 08:19:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzZFjQ89/hLbv8MkZHHcJ4WQV6QoT4D8h1wKxXCAo/ps6AFNlimwoEtDlynE20CNElViktO X-Received: by 2002:a9d:394:: with SMTP id f20mr11729035otf.148.1580573978703; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 08:19:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580573978; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yGfA+S99lgmvzSETIBMcFJ3iPDjKuWvfA5/stDBbK7Ccpw3ckPFrsKUGFWn2bzv2+I 0ykTV1GJYWWzw5NNKANan2qoIZ5rUCmofF48jnjBKvd2eU2qIzJvWFA59G/mTZx5o/sv Fvuy7Ft2xn53HQa4YCrkBUQiyDPsuj3f1kQXqR/QPlI5zWVPegYMgP166X37d3dX/DF5 iGc0Kto+1+NqYRurwrOtMcsyBJ+vcJ1aFF9+2T98Ye7YjE8PRndTOFaTlXYWj/x3yKJH 3jfvB12g/NDPPE3RHZ+aihjfbnMwLD2X4rXe4x5zSZJfdxs2oPacDjxk9JoZqGCXwF2I CsfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=1oiHGLqVyiB5iDH+So/z6e6i++g2ZDaLBGPNdUlJ33w=; b=aQ9sVA5qrqW8mvnnwmzJCmTVs+h+Rrxtppgv7G/uc1RITZvyLLTGwErsByDnFWbC7T mgjnCFgRct0jixcK5k9QGPtzf38kD7dUt6DK6HTZ+TGOcRJlQKtDCYDwywhWxdpA8Dpq j45Nhhq2UQY3CSMGauG/TXgktSQPGybygBRO2+S2eVuIkVGDhj6KGZNwB9fy4POdWZK2 ymAfOE633EU/5kQQ61AfgZzhfxHd3vb7FUb2Y81CQkxTLlxA1UtQpT2fp82t9DCKlhn4 1oLYg7gLSE1Y/QrGSuOoW6ldJBhUFplpQknyt85k+9Erx5EMlNVWbPlI7WlNzvBSpvOA aAnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w24si5571914oic.260.2020.02.01.08.19.26; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 08:19:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726885AbgBAQSG (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:18:06 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55059 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726622AbgBAQSF (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:18:05 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 011GHdmS018483; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:17:39 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 011GHbUu018479; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:17:37 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:17:37 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/32s: Don't flush all TLBs when flushing one page Message-ID: <20200201161737.GO22482@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200131155150.GD22482@gate.crashing.org> <27cef66b-df5b-0baa-abac-5532e58bd055@c-s.fr> <20200131193833.GF22482@gate.crashing.org> <248a3cf3-1b5e-a6e1-ceec-0e3904d1cf51@c-s.fr> <20200201140629.GM22482@gate.crashing.org> <96671e01-6206-8952-a498-942b42e98ef0@c-s.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96671e01-6206-8952-a498-942b42e98ef0@c-s.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:53:12PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>No, in end the low bits are set, that's a BIT OR with ~PAGE_MASK, so it > >>sets all low bits to 1. > > > >Oh, wow, yes, I cannot read apparently. > > > >Maybe there are some ROUND_DOWN and ROUND_UP macros you could use? > > Yes but my intention was to modify the existing code as less as possible. > What do you think about version v2 of the patch ? It looked fine to me. Add my Reviewed-by: Segher Boessenkool if you want. Segher