Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 1 Feb 2020 08:23:05 -0800
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, williams@redhat.com,
        bristot@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com, jack@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite
Message-ID: <20200201162305.tc4m4kv3fkc6ixob@linux-p48b>
References: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 31 Jan 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
>
>IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
>all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
>this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
>
>It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
>
>Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?

Feel free to add my:

Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>

Thanks,
Davidlohr