Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2181573ybl; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:35:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx/zj96V9e/LE029z118xdLKm5XPBDWTi1EzWOfciT1JAV2rk9Gva477kVpGzpjmgXDXbd+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1:: with SMTP id u1mr10870851oic.74.1580600110365; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 15:35:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580600110; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ahcbv9cCdLK2XYXmjPgM5FQj1SfdajJy2R3KittlaGS3W4/NsE/Dz3SJlbDFN80GfK S7rJGv4RqiJtvX30gqTw2MWnYCALrGixU+rErOI3ucZXZx3Alzl4glkfDqrvMB6+oxzR d59DWWVXTqPe5i+Qj4rz9FZJcK+T6GrihPrmM/PPDyVYmVlPcb87weBjV+BNclhb2p6h b0OL8pbs9fOpikh6nAJZpHh8qNHb1k487fVKkPVHoFz7p68IWPir+HrhF3pE8XiKmpnK FOe2ES/b7F3guxMCa92mRWzboCpXZLeghmzo0KSnBE463kP5/8wS/rh7CTCHk3PVNpG4 sBRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=Arz5MTpw/omiJTbbXaIA8l91pFNJNmfaYOxbOm/C4cI=; b=jP/DlI9LvfW+dU0ZV8kuDrwPVT6NVj0Y9rIjdbcmIXRdjpl1x2JrLteS1/HQ5zhUno 6JUvtQgmHAltPvPfo7g+D1xkzMvgBwT1cT14bpRFisD/8JqT7BZgMoaG/HGR/dpe13Z1 01JHH0T5K0rX4YuS3Fax18dpEXCTo/2HdHHSS1Ho5250Mve8YUUDE4uts/rJ2abs8P38 FBEeEeSMmfkrKHoW6rTRI578v+KnYdWPHuCAo8zXUpZYNEFmpAMZT/RXxu+Db8ZkvL5Z KuBZ32wKPi66HjyJkjCrGzo8O09WtVIunt7mAeOQT4/b50NrpY8i7ng/8J+1OoLRie6a 1zdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=GBdP1Kq5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f194si6404489oig.243.2020.02.01.15.34.45; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 15:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=GBdP1Kq5; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726733AbgBAXdK (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 18:33:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45402 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726487AbgBAXdK (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Feb 2020 18:33:10 -0500 Received: from e123331-lin.c.hoisthospitality.com (dc3829c8a.static.telenet.be [195.130.156.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 399B920661; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 23:33:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580599989; bh=ibe5zB2LbJa9M16STV/YOipNz1Z/ySZpDzrVbsEINmw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=GBdP1Kq5tcMphjjYV89zzrRs4EuDpeKKIm1QCK0tdy+gvcZX8B5Z7GT3lkb2zLmNw YnlubFz5cmaDpFN6Zhw9hwt+SJs+36Q/+6zIJT4jFgogZNDmsdfNQ0sGjFgB56Fdt0 f+L4FxvCyM+EmZ91miH97xxmyBX019Bs9XHXW/O8= From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, jrg.otte@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [PATCH] efi/x86: fix boot regression on systems with invalid memmap entries Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 00:33:04 +0100 Message-Id: <20200201233304.18322-1-ardb@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In efi_clean_memmap(), we do a pass over the EFI memory map to remove bogus entries that may be returned on certain systems. Commit 1db91035d01aa8bf ("efi: Add tracking for dynamically allocated memmaps") refactored this code to pass the input to efi_memmap_install() via a temporary struct on the stack, which is populated using an initializer which inadvertently defines the value of its size field in terms of its desc_size field, which value cannot be relied upon yet in the initializer itself. Fix this by using efi.memmap.desc_size instead, which is where we get the value for desc_size from in the first place. Tested-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c index 59f7f6d60cf6..ae923ee8e2b4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void __init efi_clean_memmap(void) .phys_map = efi.memmap.phys_map, .desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version, .desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size, - .size = data.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal), + .size = efi.memmap.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal), .flags = 0, }; -- 2.17.1