Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:25:14 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@linutronix.de, williams@redhat.com, bristot@redhat.com,
        longman@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite
Message-ID: <20200203122514.GK8582@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200131150703.194229898@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 31/01/20 16:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
> 
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
> 
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
> 
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?

FWIW, backported and tested again on downstream PREEMPT_RT kernel.
locktorture didn't find any problem and latencies look good.

Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Thanks!

Juri