Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964838AbWBDUyA (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:54:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964837AbWBDUyA (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:54:00 -0500 Received: from mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.48.8]:59059 "EHLO mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964827AbWBDUx7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:53:59 -0500 To: Nigel Cunningham cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:12:25 +1000." <200602041712.30428.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:53:55 +0000 From: Sanjoy Mahajan Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 951 Lines: 21 > After the first suspend, do you have any processes sucking all > available cpu? This sounds like a thread that has been added since > 2.6.15, which is being told to enter the freezer, but isn't doing > it. They usually end up sucking cpu afterwards. A good thought. I just tried it again. The system woke up from the first S3 sleep with nothing chewing CPU. Just as a check, the second S3 sleep still hangs with the repeating exregion-* messages. I also tried vanilla 2.6.16-rc2 (which includes the latest ACPICA releases in it), and it has the same problem. -Sanjoy `Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.' --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/