Received: by 2002:a25:8b91:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp4840322ybl; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 03:00:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdIxHdrF8KyzyIe3Wk4N+p0uNLowvfYVyQCC62Dp2LgZLWowYakozv1YNEokruQwOzVpgy X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7ada:: with SMTP id m26mr22172185otn.111.1580814039132; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 03:00:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580814039; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ba3PJzd+lcwDtk1k1wygqniuEPFBpklEN/frhRIKdQOo1jH+v6duJhZy+K/67fs+Wb J44qGclhGSvamL/iPOxSx3kRFR93Un2yVoyBDlsbmi3QkMuuDdEfsbLh5jTfjidLy6ay fyOTdOyrqSoXF9SAEr9SD3T3ZYwxJmuajunVLnSX/m1MlbWeikDCmOiPqjnBq6zFUJak 32UjWOoGVnUsJYbkk7Bp5PvWInTGDn9YC3LPG4xFHxzRXzDCayj081cXZtRb2qB+6x73 Jp5rXJv+aeRcTUM0CdvP23csp+BvZpgwJrtKmGyul/erK3iQjeJcs0NYx76D+661/mml 7tdg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=yq2wcF6/LDstn/u291r/+ythzd5EFkEq0LDyzlPH9xE=; b=H42i254tLUwKIF9atn0ayrSbSpPlrJ2AImztaOa0qR0TwXBiKPVXkRezqyoDcHzWPX Hc3rEZhWAA62ySzaXtSMOHN6ks0ZTKLkioaiR5ZNCiSO4R+4tZbTGwJXrdOvtfZ4eNOC Wg0SaAF2UJmN+qHYKYq50wwqPeqMmkubpxLr+KCIDTQ6LgaZpVrdHCFnx3RaUdtRpmTB mViskdcYUY/rJQxrxvbLuq3s60UThqD5TnSkWR6zEISUwAl3/nTyc5PbZHcRncCCIfWn CqAeK276NhWmsKcbwXrfpKtL4B6OKrjQjLQ44u8D49h6QtLaeWBPBuo57sntMMpJZxWp IS7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r26si7867641otk.79.2020.02.04.03.00.26; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 03:00:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727080AbgBDK7Q (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:59:16 -0500 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.36]:12083 "EHLO out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726895AbgBDK7P (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:59:15 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R611e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04427;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=11;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Tp7ogsz_1580813941; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Tp7ogsz_1580813941) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:59:02 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] OCFS2: remove useless err To: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kate Stewart , ChenGang , Richard Fontana , Thomas Gleixner , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1579577836-251879-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <5aa17eac-60ee-5360-81f9-7bff2cb76eb3@linux.alibaba.com> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:59:01 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5aa17eac-60ee-5360-81f9-7bff2cb76eb3@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2020/1/26 上午9:52, Joseph Qi 写道: > >> >> @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *ocfs2_find_entry_el(const char *name, int namelen, >> num++; >> >> bh = NULL; >> - err = ocfs2_read_dir_block(dir, b++, &bh, >> + ocfs2_read_dir_block(dir, b++, &bh, >> OCFS2_BH_READAHEAD); > > Umm... missing error checking here? /* * This function forces all errors to -EIO for consistency with its * predecessor, ocfs2_bread(). We haven't audited what returning the * real error codes would do to callers. We log the real codes with * mlog_errno() before we squash them. */ static int ocfs2_read_dir_block(struct inode *inode, u64 v_block, struct buffer_head **bh, int flags) According to ocfs2_read_dir_block comments, caller don't care the err value, func will log it. So is this patch ok? :) Thanks Alex