Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100
From:   Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com>,
        Christopher Kohlhoff <chris.kohlhoff@clearpool.io>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path
In-Reply-To: <20200204083237.7fa30aea@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
References: <20200203205907.291929-1-rpenyaev@suse.de>
 <51f29f23a4d996810bfad12b9634ee12@suse.de>
 <20200204083237.7fa30aea@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Message-ID: <549916868753e737316f509640550b66@suse.de>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 
>> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag,
>> or reference to the bug is enough?
> 
> Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag to
> fully credit the extra work done by the reporter.

Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com>
Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb.com>

Correct?

--
Roman