Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
        containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        omosnace@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, simo@redhat.com,
        Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        nhorman@tuxdriver.com, Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
        mpatel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V8 13/16] audit: track container nesting
Date:   Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:12:02 -0500
Message-ID: <35934535.C1y6eIYgqz@x2>
Organization: Red Hat
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRHfjuv5yyn+nQ2LbHtcezBcjKtOQ69ssYrXOiExuCjBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1577736799.git.rgb@redhat.com> <3665686.i1MIc9PeWa@x2> <CAHC9VhRHfjuv5yyn+nQ2LbHtcezBcjKtOQ69ssYrXOiExuCjBw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 10:52:36 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:47 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 8:19:44 AM EST Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > > The established pattern is that we print -1 when its unset and "?"
> > > > when
> > > > its totalling missing. So, how could this be invalid? It should be
> > > > set
> > > > or not. That is unless its totally missing just like when we do not
> > > > run
> > > > with selinux enabled and a context just doesn't exist.
> > > 
> > > Ok, so in this case it is clearly unset, so should be -1, which will be
> > > a
> > > 20-digit number when represented as an unsigned long long int.
> > > 
> > > Thank you for that clarification Steve.
> > 
> > It is literally a  -1.  ( 2 characters)
> 
> Well, not as Richard has currently written the code, it is a "%llu".
> This was why I asked the question I did; if we want the "-1" here we
> probably want to special case that as I don't think we want to display
> audit container IDs as signed numbers in general.

OK, then go with the long number, we'll fix it in the interpretation. I guess 
we do the same thing for auid.

-Steve