Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp66254ybv; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:14:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQ7yDN1++R5iile9jirHultQ/CSlIGaY6tfy13jNoU2OV8YmzH5+fSGEYRCfggV/A/R33W X-Received: by 2002:aca:6244:: with SMTP id w65mr2169456oib.113.1580894055643; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 01:14:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580894055; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zqOCMBoQfvVg+Nm2NhC60y6uDm+RowNliEwQLxxv8hslfg3Pnt6DRFAXfVNBCB8zFA XODb4vameR+pE35MpxHn3rOE330IQqnFRj23g7sa5diDOfmkCIcW7cONq2nlUjOZwP3q FuPRdowDLlauZbFX7M0jaZwbsgxZCqJiaiBI8BrRxjt7IidHY/tldKlj5y/phW+Nha5X oLuy1fLQot5YCS5oBzHe5IAht8svMkXZ32DZaUXHvndoZvb9oBOSft9+1lrIA1fFI1w7 yhT5dZfKhfh0+R7x6l/fq/A74rNZRMMsR4iQgn8sBiQRAPt62qeB/m5yrfDw9VYlLB6L p1tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=qqSRMpiNsJE4bOsRBBE7Xzpm+6BM5wBuN5TPCdk0KeQ=; b=XxQeshIldsWtYXCe8Eu5K3g/qlYqpfU9BrFIA/W/G48ttJyhpXpDlh4NjpGKWDFcqE R7gwGdB+o0t29AREhD1JtCLmKFizZvpdWkd2m+wYOXG7XOxScZ9Mg5cMMY1yGZPud72s 9LGfHF8Sml/ZuM02VmYIDVcy8bnDey2nKez56ww3VPOpUjhX5L78+ONJJ9/dWCetL6DF gCQcKyWz/SRMWFIXz4hM3Dx5a8k+0UtFKjDeb27L14BRlmae/IlYRdiCdz8uQiwNYUh/ GGw/BcVLI+Z84r9PkLBiYktqfkDI+UqXKkMDvfW4GHQrcpvynu/uTLvQrEweVHxgNWb6 OH2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k19si6196314otp.33.2020.02.05.01.14.00; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 01:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728138AbgBEJLb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 04:11:31 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42326 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727068AbgBEJLb (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 04:11:31 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA66AF27; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:11:26 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Jiaxun Yang Cc: Tiezhu Yang , Paul Burton , Ralf Baechle , Huacai Chen , Xuefeng Li , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinglu Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] MIPS: Scan the DMI system information Message-ID: <20200205101126.4fad0946@endymion> In-Reply-To: <17537451580871338@vla4-87a00c2d2b1b.qloud-c.yandex.net> References: <1579181165-2493-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> <20200203131422.384cd168@endymion> <609c7042-0e44-2bd4-5e03-97465621b184@loongson.cn> <17537451580871338@vla4-87a00c2d2b1b.qloud-c.yandex.net> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:55:38 +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > I think it is better to split it into the following two patches? > > [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START > > [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: Add support for Desktop Management Interface (DMI) > > That way will break bisect. Are you sure? As far as I can see, each patch builds individually. The dmi patch is a no-op alone. The mips patch will not work alone, obviously, however according to Tiezhu dmi_scan_machine() will fail with a harmless error message if the base address is 0xF0000. If that's correct then it's not breaking bisect. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support