Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed,  5 Feb 2020 11:14:19 +0100
Message-Id: <20200205101419.149903-1-elver@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [PATCH] kcsan: Fix 0-sized checks
From:   Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To:     elver@google.com
Cc:     paulmck@kernel.org, andreyknvl@google.com, glider@google.com,
        dvyukov@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Instrumentation of arbitrary memory-copy functions, such as user-copies,
may be called with size of 0, which could lead to false positives.

To avoid this, add a comparison in check_access() for size==0, which
will be optimized out for constant sized instrumentation
(__tsan_{read,write}N), and therefore not affect the common-case
fast-path.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 kernel/kcsan/core.c |  7 +++++++
 kernel/kcsan/test.c | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/core.c b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
index e3c7d8f34f2ff..82c2bef827d42 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/core.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
@@ -455,6 +455,13 @@ static __always_inline void check_access(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size,
 	atomic_long_t *watchpoint;
 	long encoded_watchpoint;
 
+	/*
+	 * Do nothing for 0 sized check; this comparison will be optimized out
+	 * for constant sized instrumentation (__tsan_{read,write}N).
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(size == 0))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Avoid user_access_save in fast-path: find_watchpoint is safe without
 	 * user_access_save, as the address that ptr points to is only used to
diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/test.c b/kernel/kcsan/test.c
index cc6000239dc01..d26a052d33838 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/test.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/test.c
@@ -92,6 +92,16 @@ static bool test_matching_access(void)
 		return false;
 	if (WARN_ON(matching_access(9, 1, 10, 1)))
 		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * An access of size 0 could match another access, as demonstrated here.
+	 * Rather than add more comparisons to 'matching_access()', which would
+	 * end up in the fast-path for *all* checks, check_access() simply
+	 * returns for all accesses of size 0.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON(!matching_access(8, 8, 12, 0)))
+		return false;
+
 	return true;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog